Sunday, May 17, 2015

Pattern Matching Algorithms for Instincts develop on evolutionary path of life



The Vicious Cycles in Social Context appear to be perpetually modified distinct evolutionary path of Social lifestyle. The real structural complexity would be difficult to discover in Social Context, Even if experts identify instance parameters in the first Vicious Cycle. 

Complex algorithms in Social Context used to develop originally by Systems Owners.  Global Variables are articulated and aligned with Social Context according to algorithmic parameter changes in Competitive World. Elite & Big Corporations are mechanism beyond convergence to multiple parameter sets in Competitive World. Top priority in control mechanism of Competitive World is Economic Perspectives, Political Power, and Sovereignty; therefore, economic mechanism in Competitive World modifies structure of Global Variables.

System Owners try to control System Platform according to general economic modeling in Competitive World.  Mapping between System Platform and Competitive World create and save economic modeling and Competitive perspectives in Social Context, which is contrast with human nature and Social Innovation. A tangled mapping operation in Competitive World generates complex Social Context and modifies Human Instincts.

Complex Instincts are activated in Brain through cycles of time (low numbers of good instincts and high numbers of bad instincts might be possessed by human beings). Complex Instincts generate unethical Decision Making and eventually cause unhealthy behaviors and lifestyle choices.

Side effects of unhealthy Behavior and Lifestyle Choices modify Social Context and initiate The First Vicious Cycle, which cause unlimited complexity.  It may resolve neither complex Social Context nor poor activated instincts.

Global variables should have articulated by Systems Owners according to Pattern Matching Algorithms for good instincts.  Economic perspectives can articulate after good multiple instincts executions ( ). 
                                                                      


Observation:
System Owners must be expected multiple bad instincts executions ( ) among innocent people when Social Context allocates Vicious Cycle Mode.

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Outflow obstruction can occur in feedback loop



Feedback process is initiated by instructor and learner tries to target algorithmic functions and threads in a Feedback framework. The Digestion process in brain implies to mechanism mode, which Feedback Threads capture successfully.  Threads Reference boosts, synchronizes, and saves in Domain Registration. Eventually, it returns signal ( ) function to Brain Controller in order to call threads which is associated with Presence Conceptual Knowledge. When Instance Threads of Presence Conceptual Knowledge identify in Brain then start Adjustment Process Mode. Compare old threads with new Feedback threads in terms of maximizing common threads synchronization. Sensor mode implies to learner who wants to control Feedback Threads through knowledge examination.  Output threads can be controlled by external or internal entities.  Open-loop feedback Mode (critical feedback undermine learning) can inspire learner to contact with instructor again and provide specific feedback. Closed-loop feedback Mode indicates that threads in Feedback solve complexity in relevant data structures. (Fig 1& Fig 2)
In a number of ways, Feedback fails to respond and learner might be frustrated according to following risk factors.
1- Instructor cannot use pedagogical content knowledge in order to keep track of communication threads; therefore, response to question would be irrelevant.
2- A question response has not pedagogical principles and parameters theory in learning styles.
3- Feedback Threads have inconsistent map; therefore, Digestion process encounter with complexity in Brain.
4- Digestion process does not register in the Brain. Learner has not plan to review Feedback threads.
5- Brain cannot adjust Feedback Threads with Presence of Conceptual Knowledge.
Feedback threads can be reviewed by Brain or external entities (examination). Open-loop feedback (inconsistent feedback threads) needs to be recovered by instructor (controller).
                                                                     
 
Observation:
Brain is a sort of Black Box, which internal abstract model and genetic algorithm frameworks can be read, interpreted, and concretized through the way Brain Mechanisms work.

                                                                       

                                                                       


 


Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Early identification of Harmonic Balance in response to external changes improve efficiency



Early identification of Harmonic Balance in response to external changes can ensure maximum benefit, reduce costs, and improve operational efficiency in both Non-biological Systems and Biological Systems.

One of the substantial strategic and responsiveness aims for system performance is to control changes in external environment and makes internal adjustments due to external changes.  Early identification and treatment of low Harmonic Balance restrains suboptimal fiscal outcomes and place costly burden in system framework.

One of the signs of Harmonic Balance in Biological Systems is consistency in Social Behavior; however, inconsistency in Social Behavior can indicate low level of Harmonic Balance.

One of the signs of Harmonic Balance in Non-biological Systems is consistency in operational procedures; nevertheless, inconsistency in operational procedures can indicate low level of Harmonic Balance.

Early identified sign of low Harmonic Balance prevent critical thinking impede Non-Biological Systems and serious social dilemma.

Internal adjustment

Non-biological Systems: The optimal internal adjustment due to external changes is to build new Codes and to implement new strategy in order to create operational flexibility.  Instance parameter of internal adjustment requires financial confirmation by System Owner and a close analysis overview of economic perspective in Competitive World.

Biological Systems can handle external changes in conformity with level of Harmonic Balance in Brain, strengthened Superego, and instance parameters in Superego Adjuster.

According to observational study, Non-biological systems may have problem to cope with external changes due to perception of economic demand and correlation between Systems Owners and Competitive World. Biological Systems have complexity to deal with external changes because of low level of Harmonic Balance in Brain, weakened Superego, and unreliable Superego Adjuster.

Biological Systems are more vulnerable than Non-biological Systems. Because, Systems Owners use potential resources in order to capture and adapt changes in system boundary. Non-biological Systems have essential role to play in Competitive World.  Sensitivity of economic transactions in Non-biological Systems can challenge both Systems Owners and (Elite & Big Corporations) to monitor state of uncertainties and undesirable condition regularly. Therefore, the level of risk facing Non-biological Systems would be minimized. Most Biological Systems have issues related to Harmonic Balance, weak Superego, and unreliable Superego Adjuster. A possible vulnerability in Non-biological Systems leads and develops critical issues in Biological Systems too.

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Instance of critical Social Context can execute complex process in Formative Assessment



The Competitive World inspires System Owners to enhance social dimensions of competitive context. System Owners can support educational fields through competitive training and learning.  Global Variables (Legislation) must be articulated by Systems Owner. The indispensable role of holistic structure in Global Variables is economic perspective. Among others, Systems Owners address education and conceptual framework for developing effective teaching, discipline based knowledge, and pedagogical understanding in Global Variables.  It requires implementing successful benchmark test method in order to use practical approach for monitoring student learning and improve teaching by adaptive optimal feedback control.

The Formative Assessment implemented in educational world as an optimal feedback control model for innovation in learning and teaching. Optimal feedback control is commonly used to help students and identify their strengths and weaknesses. Eventually, it draws a mind map of problems that affect student progress. It characterizes and reflects comprehensively solution answer keys with Affective Feedback Models to local education authorities and parents.

Teachers signify level of knowledge and student capability on path of education (Outside Analysis) Fig1.  The role of teacher in guiding and preparing appropriate method for teaching is an essential tool for student development program (Create Method) Fig1. 

Identify level of student knowledge and align proper method and correct procedure for teaching can help students to Paying Attention during lectures (Pay Attention) Fig1. 

Students are not always aware of why they pay attention or not due to level of Harmonic Balance in Brain and Distraction level through instance parameters within social context. 

The Harmonic Balance Algorithms determines how Brain Mechanism control functions for Paying Attention and respond to stimulus according to previous case studies. Consistency, efficient, and high level of Harmonic Balance can improve concentration and focus with neurotransmitter balancing. Inconsistency, inefficient, and low level of Harmonic Balance deteriorates Brain Mechanism control functions for paying attention and responding to environmental parameters.   

Distraction generates originally in Global Variables due to hidden corrupted parameters in Global Variables and Competitive World. It propagates in Social Context and eventually causes side-effects on twisted evolutionary path of life. Low level of distraction boosts optimal concentration and Paying Attention. High level of distraction can modify students Paying Attention and self-control in classroom. Some contextual elements influencing learning define as followings:

1. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
2. TV show and on-line flash games, Cell phones games, game videos.
3. Intimate relationship during the early stages.
4. Distinct emotions toward entertainment show.
5. Extreme sports activities.
6. Pursue adventure.
7. Alcohol and tobacco addiction.
8. Family and relationship issues. (Family may face financial problem).
9. Obsessive thoughts.
10. Outrageous playfulness.
11. Having many Hobbies and Amusements.  
12.  Unusually tired and sleepy most of the time.
13. Prejudicial preservation instinct.
14. High unemployment rate.


Both High level of Harmonic Balance and Low level of Distraction promote students in involvement opportunities and learning in classroom (Involvement). Both low level of Harmonic Balance and High level of Distraction obstruct learning paths and teaching strategies; therefore, optimal Stimulus method, constructive feedback, and developmental Formative Assessment would not assist education plans. 

Optimal Paying Attention can promote students engagement, motivation, and ultimately enhance effective learning. Satisfied test shows in diagnostic test for stimulus and response method. At this juncture, can Formative Assessment can be used by instructors in order to activate feedback loops that assist learning and teaching. Instructors use new stimulus and response method when not satisfied parameter shows in diagnostic test.
                                                                      


Observation:

There is a proper analogy between a concept driven strategy in CRM and a concept driven strategy in Formative Assessment. Key concepts for strategic CRM are increasingly targeting customer’s expectation, solve current problem, and finally meet customer expectations by supporting customer life-cycle value chain. Key concepts for strategic Formative Assessment are Student Learning Guide, identify possible problem in teaching techniques, and effective feedback to students.

Observation:

High level of Harmonic Balance in Educational Institute makes more opportunities for teachers’ involvement and eventually, teachers support the best value in Formative Assessment.