Thursday, June 29, 2023

External Frequencies Modify the DNA of Organisms

All entities in the universe are molecules vibrating at various speeds—for example. Vibration can include plants, rocks, animals, thoughts, and emotions. Human frequencies are composed of everything from physical matter to abstract things, like communicating your ideas. In other words, some molecules vibrate faster, and some vibrate slower; there are higher and lower vibrations.
Human cells can start to mutate when their frequency drops below 62MHz and cause illness. Therefore, High Frequencies can promote emotional stability and reduce stress, and Low Frequencies perpetuate sickness in the human body. Besides, Happiness, Sadness, Anger, and Calmness allocate a frequency range of 417-440 HZ.
The Conscious Component Channel resonates and transfers frequency waves to the Brain Framework, Cells, and DNA properties. Cells that vibrate at a higher frequency are full of energy and are healthy, reflecting how we feel. A healthy human body vibrates at a frequency range of (62-70 MHz).
External Forces can modify specific organisms’ DNA properties by transmitting positive/Negative Frequencies to the Conscious Component by editing codes and destination addresses. Designated codes identify a domain of property and change the specific variable of functionality beyond organisms. (Fig1)
                                                                                
                                                                              
Observation:
External Forces can vibrate with Negative Frequencies, which contain algorithmic bias, and search for organisms with a fuzzy logical set of functionalities. Algorithmic principles can edit and modify source protocol codes beyond the DNA Framework. The designated organism would develop errors in the long term.

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

The Paradox of Developing Gender Norms

Systems Owners focus on harmonizing System Platforms through articulated Optimal Global Variables, but specific Variables may hardly align with the characteristics of Biological Systems. Therefore, Biological Systems would exercise Suboptimal Codes beyond Global Variables in Social Contexts that may modify Gender Instincts, a life cycle of gender socialization/ stereotyping, and eventually, Decision-Making Models. 
Women can confront gender inequality and social violation through gender-based discrimination. They face abuse and unequal treatment in their wider communities, so Social Complexity can challenge Systems Owners to subset Social Norms through algorithmic codes behind Global Variables. The New Social Norms can generate empathy and Gender equality within activities at work and in Social Contexts.
Women might exercise masculine assignments and possess attitudes for accomplishing specific tasks daily. As a side effect, wielding the New Social Norms of women can modify the Preprogrammed Codes of Gender Instinct and increase male gender norms among women.
This phenomenon causes women to make decisions more and less similar to men. Partially, women feel the same way as men and allocate homogeneous algorithmic codes of Male Gender Instinct.
Heterosexual women who exercise men’s model decision-making have difficulty compromising with Men. Male gender norms within their Instinct Components can perpetuate tendencies to encapsulate Bisexual Emotions in the Subconscious Component (without having intimate sexual relationships with similar sex). Women can get stuck in a particulate domain between the boundaries of Heterosexuality and Bisexuality.
 
Observation:
According to an observational study, these women may get satisfaction and happiness to gain more attention from other women. They focus and compete on appearances/beauty and need confirmation of their attractiveness from other women.
 
Observation:
Predictably, Systems Owners attempt to optimize Global Variables to harmonize and improve various circumstances within Social Contexts in the future; however, each modification in characteristics of Biological Systems can generate complexity and side effects on the evolutionary path of life.
 

Social Hypocrisy and Intangible Factors in Decisions

Social Hypocrisy can obstruct distinct basic instincts and hold them in starvation modes. Therefore, instinct deprivations cause and create ...