Global Variables must be articulated according to the Business Model
Concept on the System Partner Network. Such a complicated pattern construction may
block specific Resource Allocation Processes and functionalities. However,
internal system activities need to cope with changes in external environments.
Many parameters and submodules require significant changes when developing an
implementation plan in the outer system domain. Strategic parameters in the
partner network can hardly align with every single component in the short term.
System complexity might appear while external environments encounter
interoperability issues among their system resources.
Welcome, and thanks for visiting. The blog shared a summary case study with readers fascinated by an unknown Phenomenon.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Seizing Power Democratically through Invisible Political Networks
The Outputs of Decisions in various System
Platforms can sometimes be generated through multiple Invisible Networks.
Eventually, the Powerful Decision-makers from External Forces can modify the
outputs of Their Decisions. System Elements may believe that transparent
Networks make Global Variables (General Rules and Regulations) of either System
Platforms or Social Contexts.
For example, according to Figure 1, the
Four Transparent Groups (GA, GB, GC, GD) with identical members make decisions
for System Platform Z. In reality, the Outputs of Decisions are created through
complicating Invisible Group Networks. Specific members in four groups have
a Secret Strategy to dominate Decision-Making; therefore, they try to modify
Decisions for their benefit.
The two-member representatives in Group A
(Ea1 and Ea7) and two-member representatives in Group B (Eb1 and Eb6)
establish Invisible Network F.
One member representative in Group C (Ec4), two member representatives in Group D (Ed4 and Ed7), and one member
representative in Group B (Eb4) select Visible Network H. Member representative in Invisible Network
F and Visible Network H establish Invisible Network G. Network G modifies a Decision-Making
Process within Groups A and B.
The member representatives in Group A (Ea2,
Ea3, Ea4, Ea5, Ea8) and Group B (Eb2, Eb3, Eb4, Eb5, Eb7) believe that a
Decision -Making is a design for them. External Forces modify a Decision-Making
protocol within Invisible Network G. Invisible Network Models can integrate, but
member representatives need a more holistic view of the Decision-Making
Process.
The member representatives Ec5 and Ec7 in
Group C integrate with the member representative Ea6 in Group A and establish
Invisible Network M. The Invisible Network M cannot affect
the Decision-Making Process within System Platform Z due to low feedback support
from members within Invisible Networks.
Observation:
According to the case study, Member Invisible Networks members may
possess a strong Ego and Competitive Instinct. Member group representatives can
encapsulate both a moderate Superego and a Cooperative Instinct.
Observation:
Mutual Benefits and Interests can challenge members to cooperate within
the Invisible Political Network.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Frequency Converter in the Subconscious Component
The secrets of the universe are hidden, and current academic research through the top-down analysis approach model may not cover invisible...
-
Volunteers are the backbone of the System Platform. They provide valuable economic benefits for System Instances. However, volunteerism ca...