The Paradox of the Ego Domain in Decision-Making Patterns

Intensive Global Competition modifies most entities within Social Contexts and aggravates the Vicious Cycle in Human life. A chaotic environment and unpredictability need a forceful Competitive Instinct, which persuades an active, vigorous Ego Framework. Humans can respond and survive through unrest situations surrounding the life cycle when the Diligent Ego Framework dominates events. Persistent mechanisms behind Ego Software Codes can get overwhelming complexity in the Social Environment, and it causes inequality in the relationship with the Superego Structure. Therefore, the universe may encounter more brutal, turbulent, and hysterical movements.

Humans need to practice Decision-Making to minimize the force of Ego Characters and algorithmic codes beyond the designated Network Instincts. For example, exercising austerity as a lifestyle can moderate the power of the Ego State and contribute to Harmonic Balance in the Conscious Component and Social Behaviors.

A default Ego Algorithm can hardly manage harsh environments, so the Survival Instinct requires a dynamic Ego capability to control resilience. Optimal life perception can inspire and create a unique relationship between the Superego and Ego Domain.

Observation:

The attenuated strength of the Ego Framework can activate and significantly promote a Higher Level of Consciousness. Besides, Friendly Instincts have opportunities to encapsulate in a Decision-Making Map.

Observation:

According to earlier research, a phenomenon of Harmonic Balance within Iceberg Cells can ensure the sustainability of all life on Planet Earth.

Factors Beyond Lifespan Dependency on Earth

This study focuses on how optimal assets can be shared for feasible activities and improve harmonic balance among resources by configuring Ideal Protocols in the System Platform. Systems Owners tend to build and distribute the priority of Resource Allocation and ignore pursuing righteousness to share system assets because of the invisible threat of algorithms beyond the Survival Instinct. The Network of the Competitive Instinct, called the Survival Instinct, protects the system platform from external forces.

The first case scenario targets Suboptimal Asset Sharing, which indicates lower security in the entire system layers and attenuates the degree of satisfaction among internal and external beneficiaries. Distinct Resources with deficient allocating assets may move to breakdown mode, and others create a sense of insecurity, anxiety, and imbalance in system environments. Systems Owners are obliged to finance Centralized Control Systems and ignore the Optimal Resource Allocation. 

Observation:

The outcome of Suboptimal Resource Allocation within Social Contexts, among others, is hatred and polarization. The rich get wealthier, and the poor get poorer long-term. According to an observational study, inequality will increase steadily over time. This phenomenon can sustain and cause the annihilation process and immense changes.