Modern nepotism parameters can be established beyond Global Variables and
constructs for the competitive assets of Systems Owners. Nevertheless, the old
nepotism model articulates just single individual prosperity.
The Modern nepotism model refers to Systems Owners who select candidates
for core competency regarding their benefits through a certain age, gender, or
ethnic group. Individuals and designated groups exploit core competency dumb
luck, and other candidates face discrimination. Lucky favored individuals who
select for core competency do not struggle for positions. Modern
favoritism develops core competency algorithms, encapsulating Global Variables
in the system framework.
The old favoritism builds on bilateral communication, contracts, network
relationships, and invisible promotion. The Systems Owners support
the old favoritism movement because the parameter thread of the old nepotism
instance links with the parameter thread of modern favoritism. The old nepotism movement
challenges entities to join specific networks for core competency. Both nepotism
models create invisible entities in system environments.
Observation:
Parameters beyond nepotism movements are not transparent. Any activities
that refer to nepotism movements are against the parameters of constitutional
law. Parameters of the nepotism movement can become distinct when a single
parameter entangles with a bribery scandal and links to rumor maps.
