Evolution of the Nepotism Model

In contrast to the traditional nepotism model, which focuses solely on the prosperity of a single individual, the modern nepotism framework extends beyond simple Global Variables and constructs, shaping the competitive assets of Systems Owners.

The modern nepotism model involves Systems Owners who select candidates based on attributes such as age, gender, or ethnicity to enhance their benefits. This approach results in specific individuals or groups favored due to sheer luck, allowing them to bypass challenges in securing core competency positions while other candidates face discrimination. Modern favoritism also incorporates algorithms to establish core competencies, embedding Global Variables within system structures.

Traditional favoritism, on the other hand, relies on bilateral communication, contracts, network connections, and unseen forms of promotion. Systems Owners continue to support this older approach because the principles of traditional nepotism align with those of modern favoritism. The old nepotism model encourages entities to join exclusive networks to access core competencies. Both models foster the creation of invisible actors within system environments, influencing outcomes from behind the scenes.

 

Observation:

Parameters beyond nepotism movements are often opaque. Any activities associated with nepotism movements typically violate the principles of constitutional law. However, the parameters of nepotism become more discernible when a specific instance becomes entangled in a bribery scandal or connects to the spread of rumors of misinformation/ disinformation.