Instincts that remain trapped in
prolonged starvation states, where essential needs are repeatedly denied or
deferred, profoundly influence the quality of decision-making, the regulation
of social behavior, and the stability of environmental contexts. Within human
populations, observational evidence suggests that the Sexual Instinct tends to
dominate the subconscious arena, often operating within the framework of an Old
open-loop cycle of instinctual processing. Once disrupted or artificially
prolonged, this cycle can foster states of deprivation that manifest in metaphorical
patterns (e.g., symbolic behavioral substitutions) and physiological
manifestations (e.g., stress-induced somatic responses). Over a lifetime, algorithmic
codes operating beyond the Subconscious Component adapt and extend, embedding
these prolonged starvation modes into the structural design of instinctual
responses.
At a systemic level, Systems Owners, those
who shape collective environments and impose regulatory frameworks, introduce and
generate global variables designed to limit and structure sexual expression.
These externally imposed restrictions function as stabilizing mechanisms that
preserve social harmony but simultaneously increase the complexity of
instinctual processing cycles. In this manner, regulatory controls serve as
guardians of communal balance and as constraints that intensify internal
conflict between instinctual drives and societal expectations.
The Survival Instinct frequently
intercepts or overrides the signals of the Sexual Instinct during starvation
cycles. The pursuit of Closed-loop resolution, a form of instinctual closure, often
collides with the role-based conflicts imposed by social systems. When such
collisions persist, the result is a deadlock between Survival and Sexual
Instincts. This locked configuration undermines multitasking abilities,
compromises decision-making efficiency, and obstructs the coherence necessary
for advancing along the evolutionary path of life. In these states, networks of
instincts may reconfigure themselves in unfriendly or maladaptive patterns,
attempting to force closed-loop conditions through chaotic means. The outcomes
are often unpredictable, producing instability within the individual psyche and
the surrounding environment.
Within the starvation domain,
instinctual cycles that fail to achieve the Closed-loop condition within
distinct instincts can obstruct feedback to external needs so that those
instincts in deadlock remain in a starvation process in the Subconscious
Component. These conflicts limit the flow of logical data and symbolic
interpretation into the Conscious Component, thereby impairing the capacity for
reflective judgment. The system becomes trapped between primal drives and
external regulation, unable to establish coherence across its cognitive layers.
Observation 1:
Algorithmic codes operating beyond the Conscious and Subconscious Components
exhibit functional analogies to binary computational codes and the chemical
signaling mechanisms within neural frameworks. Just as binary sequences guide
artificial systems and neurotransmitters modulate synaptic activity, these
algorithmic codes orchestrate instincts' activation, suppression, and
modulation.
Observation 2:
The quality of decision-making patterns is directly correlated with the number
of instincts caught in the starvation domain and the duration of their
persistence in deadlock mode. The longer instincts remain in unresolved cycles,
the more fragmented decision-making patterns become. Chaotic environmental
conditions exacerbate this process by destabilizing the resource allocation
mechanisms required for instinctual closure. As resources are diverted or
withheld, multiple instincts slip into dormant starvation states, awaiting cues
and activation or external feedback that may never arrive.
When the Subconscious Component is
overburdened with such unresolved cycles, the Conscious Component struggles to
generate coherent logical input for decision-making frameworks. The result is a breakdown in cognitive integration, so
individuals lose their ability to effectively engage with the open-loop cycle
of instincts and instead drift into disoriented, incomprehensible conditions.
Optimal decisions are obstructed within this state, and evolutionary
advancement hinders further adaptation.
