This study investigates how aggressive
instincts form specialized subnetworks within the broader Network of
Competitive Instincts in response to the Survival Instinct. These instinctual
subnetworks are designed to create Closed-loop conditions within the
Subconscious Component. By integrating algorithmic instinct codes, these
subnetworks operate independently of the Belief System and Iceberg Cells,
generating instinctual responses that bypass higher-level cognitive filters.
Within this framework, data clusters
from the Subconscious Component can merge with logical data from the Conscious
Component to shape the decision-making map and prepare for code execution.
However, when aggressive codes originate outside the Network of Competitive
Instincts and environmental contexts, they often conflict with the ethical
boundaries defined by the Conscious Component's logical data. The most
aggressive algorithmic codes are prioritized and developed for immediate
execution to satisfy the Survival Instinct, particularly when the domain of older
open-loop cycles remains unresolved and physical-world stressors are high.
As a result, the decision-making
process may bypass rational analysis and ethical evaluation, focusing instead
on immediate preservation under complex, high-pressure conditions in the
physical world. This dynamic becomes a particularly dangerous tendency when
influential decision-makers shape global structures within social contexts. In
such scenarios, a decision-making map devoid of rational and ethical codes
risks system collapse and may destroy vital principles in environmental
contexts on the path of human evolution. (Fig. 1, 2)
Instinct clusters and subdivisions
The Instinct Component within the
Subconscious Component has an immense range of functional mechanisms of instincts,
potentially billions, which can be broadly categorized into:
1. General Instincts
2. Genetic Instincts
3. Gender Instincts
This study focuses explicitly on
General Instincts, which are dynamically activated gradually or remain dormant
depending on environmental triggers. These instincts are not permanently fixed
to any one subnetwork but can be temporarily allocated based on situational
demands.
Several key factors influence the aggressiveness level of these
subnetworks:
1- Environmental stress factors and resource scarcity: Competition and Tension, Economic Disparities and Power Imbalances, Violent Conflict and Instability, Displacement and Migration.
2- The structural integrity and characteristics of the Ego Framework.
3- Legacy open-loop instinctual cycles and instinct starvation mode.
In harsher environments, individuals
require more antagonistic and aggressive subnetworks within the Network of
Competitive Instincts to ensure survival.
Figure 2 introduces a theoretical
model of five conceptual instinctual subnetworks, labeled a, p, x, y, and z, each
exhibiting varying degrees of aggression. These subnetworks are assumed to
respond directly to signals from the Survival Instinct, shifting their
operations into Closed-loop mode when necessary from designated open-loop
instincts. However, these subnetworks' precise strength, influence, and
interaction dynamics remain unknown. This uncertainty makes it difficult to
predict how aggressive components within these instinctual architectures might
impact rational decision-making or ethical outcomes. (Fig.
1, 2)
Based on
observational studies conducted on December 10 and 18, 2023, and earlier
research, The
Paradox of Human Life and Simulation Theory proposes that human
decision-making patterns can be modeled predictively through advanced
algorithmic frameworks operating beyond the Subconscious Component. These
instance-based algorithmic codes are believed to resonate with specific
vibrational frequencies that influence the broader field of global
consciousness. At the highest level, an entity referred to as the Supervisor
of Global Consciousness governs the universal logical principles
that shape both global awareness and the course of human evolution. This
supervisory force ensures life can unfold according to a predetermined
evolutionary trajectory. (Fig. 3)
Observation 1:
In recent years,
scientific advancements and the widespread dissemination of open knowledge have
reinforced the structural foundations of the Superego through scientific debate topics in mainstream
media. Simultaneously, the influence
and strength of the Superego framework can diminish the force of the Ego
structure within the Subconscious Component. This imbalance has led to a more
dominant and complex strength of the Superego structure in social contexts,
characterized by diffuse and fuzzy algorithmic codes extending beyond the Ego's
traditional boundaries. Consequently, the potential for a balanced and
constructive dialogue between the Ego and Superego can be diminished,
disrupting the coherent patterns, rational experiences, and logical data within
the Conscious Component on
the evolutionary path.
One of humanity's
core functions on Earth is the creation of logical codes, structured data
systems that guide individuals in navigating and resolving social complexity
throughout their life path. Within this process, the Supervisor of Global
Consciousness plays a pivotal role by transmitting disruptive algorithmic codes
to the Subconscious Component of influential decision-makers when there is an
imbalance in dialogue harmony between the Ego/ Superego framework. These
individuals, in turn, shape global variables across diverse environments, often
triggering instability, fragmentation, and systemic disorder. Such global
instability can intensify survival struggles, leading to a reinforcement of the
Ego structure. A harmonious dialogue must emerge between the Ego and Superego
frameworks and the logical data within the Conscious Component to promote life
on Earth.
To address these
challenges, humanity must tap into higher-order knowledge beyond mere
awareness, enabling individuals to navigate social complexity more effectively.
This deeper understanding allows for generating innovative logical frameworks,
restoring cognitive balance, and advancing civilization toward a new era of
clarity, insight, and transformative problem-solving.
Observation 2:
The strength of
Superego structural codes is influenced by the quality of the optimal Superego
Adjuster within the physical world. This Adjuster plays a key role by
activating friendly instincts in the Subconscious Component and reinforcing
optimal logical data in the Conscious Component. It also helps suppress harmful
activities generated by the aggressive Ego structure and its associated network
of wicked instincts. The Optimal Superego Adjuster includes religion, life
philosophy, psychoanalytic frameworks, austere lifestyles, cultural paradigms,
experiential knowledge, ethical standards, responsible mainstream media, and
scientific information.
