Hypocritical Instinct is Defense and Promoter Mechanism within
Biological Systems. However, it generates complex parameters in Social Context
when Systems Owners define the Hypocritical Algorithm behind Global
Variables. Hypocritical Arguments can be identified in Social Contexts as common
side effects of Global Variables.
Deceptive Definitions mobilize in Social Contexts and build Hypocrisy
in the long term. Social Hypocrisy activates and stimulates Hypocritical
Instincts in Biological Systems.
Hypocritical Instinct propagates and rolls back new Social Hypocrisy
with the more complicated phenomenon.
Systems Owners can hardly eliminate allocated parameters in Social
Hypocrisy because of adapting instance parameters in Global Variables. The
flawed code process in Global Variables may hardly be erased because it inherits
traits passed from the Competitive World.
Social Hypocrisy is sometimes sub-optimized by Systems Owners through
new Hypocritical Codes. Thus, multiple Social Hypocrisies customize Social
Contexts on the evolutionary path of System performance. Furthermore, the
surrounding environment can convey Hypocrisies and undesirable common
side-effects of Hypocrisies.
Observation:
Sub-optimization in Social Hypocrisy is cost-effective and would hardly
require imminent empirical knowledge management approaches.
Observation:
The number of Active and Inactive instances of the Primary
Instinct determines
pattern-matching algorithms in Decision-Making Model. Two Biological Systems
would barely have the correlative numbers of Active and Inactive Primary
Instincts. Therefore, Biological Systems have unique characteristics. The
number of Active and Inactive instances of the Primary Instinct distinguish particular
perspectives in Social Contexts.
