This study explores how aggressive instincts form
networks within the "Network of Competitive Instincts" to respond to
the Survival Instinct. These instinctual networks function to create closed-loop
conditions within the Subconscious Component. By integrating instincts and
constructing these networks, algorithmic codes can be generated beyond the
influence of the Belief System and Iceberg Cells. The Subconscious Component's
data clusters can merge with Logical Data from the Conscious Component for
final analysis, preparing the decision-making map for code execution. However,
aggressive codes outside the Network of Competitive Instincts do not align with
the Logical Data of the Conscious Component. Since the Logical Data sets
ethical boundaries, aggressive algorithmic codes are executed immediately to
satisfy the Survival Instinct. As a result, the decision-making map lacks
rational codes, focusing instead on preserving individuals entangled with
complexity from the domain of old open-loop cycles.
This dynamic phenomenon can drive individuals to the
edge of danger, mainly when prominent decision-makers are involved. A
decision-making map devoid of rational codes risks self-destruction, and in
these scenarios, influential decision-makers may eliminate essential social
contexts along life's evolutionary path. (See Figures 1
and 2.)
Assessing the Aggressiveness Level of Instinct Networks
The Instinct
Component within the Subconscious contains many instincts, potentially
numbering billions. These instincts can be categorized into three main types:
- General Instinct
- Genetic Instinct
- Gender Instinct
This study
focuses specifically on general instincts within the Instinct Component. These
instincts are allocated with activated/ dormant or activated instincts that are
not permanently assigned to specific networks.
External environment
conditions influence the aggressiveness level of instinct networks within the
broader Competitive Instinct framework, the structure of the Ego framework,
and the domain of old open-loop instinctual cycles that
challenge human survival. Humans
who live in harsher environmental contexts need more antagonistic and aggressive
instincts of networks within the Network of Competitive Instincts for survival.
Figure 2 proposes
a hypothesis involving five different instinct networks (labeled a, p, x, y,
z), each containing varying degrees of aggressive instincts. These networks are
thought to respond to the Survival Instinct signals to shift into a closed-loop
mode. However, the exact strength and influence of these assumption instinct networks
are unknown, making it difficult to predict how aggressive elements within the
networks might alter decision-making processes. (See Figures 1
and 2.)
Based on the
observational study conducted on December 10 and 18, 2023, along with earlier
research, The Paradox of Human Life and Simulation Theory proposes
that decision-making patterns can be mapped through algorithmic models that
extend beyond the Subconscious Component level. The instance algorithmic codes can
resonate with specific frequencies that influence global consciousness. The
entity referred to as the "Supervisor of Global Consciousness"
governs the universal logical principles that shape both global consciousness
and human evolution, guiding life along a predetermined evolutionary
trajectory. (see Figure 3)
Observation:
In recent years, advancements in scientific
research and the expansion of open knowledge have strengthened the structural
foundations of the Superego within social contexts while weakening the Ego's
role in the Subconscious Component. This shift has led to the Superego taking
on a more dominant and complex form, characterized by fuzzy algorithmic codes
extending beyond the Ego boundaries. As a result, the potential for balanced
dialogue between the Ego and the Superego has diminished, hindering the
production of Logical Data within the Conscious Component.
One of humanity's fundamental roles is to
generate logical codes that enable individuals to navigate and address social
complexities throughout their evolutionary journey. The Supervisor of Global
Consciousness plays a pivotal role in this process, transferring algorithmic
codes to influential decision-makers who, in turn, establish Global Variables
in various environmental contexts, often leading to chaotic situations. To
overcome these challenges, humans must tap into advanced knowledge that
transcends the Superego Framework. By doing so, they can create new Logical
Data and guide in a new era of understanding and problem-solving.
