Systems Owners
implement Manipulative Global Strategies for two primary reasons. First, they
aim to rebuild global structures when confusion and social conflict escalate
between system components and their environments. By exploiting global paradigm
strategies, Systems Owners deliberately increase the complexity of system
parameters, making it difficult for system elements and competitors to identify
underlying issues stemming from hierarchical layers and system operations. Over
time, Systems Owners can maintain concealed policy strategies and enhance
analog algorithms within the system framework.
The second reason
revolves around pursuing immediate profits or achieving harmonic balance within
the system framework. When hierarchical layers seek quick gains or external
forces that alter the system's environment, Systems Owners must adapt by
incorporating new global variables and strategies. These modifications,
however, often lead to confusion and disruption within system platforms.
The modification
of global strategy is often evaluated through a waterfall process. As a result,
the side effects of these strategies can lead to increased complexity in system
frameworks, particularly in managing multiple inheritances in superclass
structures. Systems Owners may identify subcomponents as functions or instance
parameters to restore harmonic balance in the system domain. One of their key
responsibilities is articulating and implementing these manipulative global
strategies across their platforms.