Sunday, June 21, 2009

Seizing Power Democratically through Invisible Political Networks

The Outputs of Decisions in various System Platforms can sometimes be generated through multiple Invisible Networks. Eventually, the Powerful Decision-makers from External Forces can modify the outputs of Their Decisions. System Elements may believe that transparent Networks make Global Variables (General Rules and Regulations) of either System Platforms or Social Contexts.
For example, according to Figure 1, the Four Transparent Groups (GA, GB, GC, GD) with identical members make decisions for System Platform Z. In reality, the Outputs of Decisions are created through complicating Invisible Group Networks. Specific members in four groups have a Secret Strategy to dominate Decision-Making; therefore, they try to modify Decisions for their benefit.
The two-member representatives in Group A (Ea1 and Ea7) and two-member representatives in Group B (Eb1 and Eb6) establish Invisible Network F.
One member representative in Group C (Ec4), two member representatives in Group D (Ed4 and Ed7), and one member representative in Group B (Eb4) select Visible Network H. Member representative in Invisible Network F and Visible Network H establish Invisible Network G. Network G modifies a Decision-Making Process within Groups A and B.
The member representatives in Group A (Ea2, Ea3, Ea4, Ea5, Ea8) and Group B (Eb2, Eb3, Eb4, Eb5, Eb7) believe that a Decision -Making is a design for them. External Forces modify a Decision-Making protocol within Invisible Network G. Invisible Network Models can integrate, but member representatives need a more holistic view of the Decision-Making Process.
The member representatives Ec5 and Ec7 in Group C integrate with the member representative Ea6 in Group A and establish Invisible Network M. The Invisible Network M cannot affect the Decision-Making Process within System Platform Z due to low feedback support from members within Invisible Networks. 

                                                                    
 
Observation:
According to the case study, Member Invisible Networks members may possess a strong Ego and Competitive Instinct. Member group representatives can encapsulate both a moderate Superego and a Cooperative Instinct.

Observation:
Mutual Benefits and Interests can challenge members to cooperate within the Invisible Political Network.
                                                                            

Social Hypocrisy and Intangible Factors in Decisions

Social Hypocrisy can obstruct distinct basic instincts and hold them in starvation modes. Therefore, instinct deprivations cause and create ...