Competitive World Generates Radicalization Patterns

This transdisciplinary research focuses on addressing the root of radicalization and how the general notion of radicalization develops, persuading individuals to follow their ethical instincts. An observational study also examines the role of external forces in modifying the social collaboration model, ultimately transforming it into the radical society model along the evolutionary path of life (XY axis). Metaphorical understanding is explored to present invisible entities beyond radicalization patterns.

In an observational study, the black box testing method handles complex input/output maps in social contexts and the Conscious Component. External forces beyond the competitive world possess the super-active survival instinct and the aggressive network of the competitive instinct within the Subconscious Component. The financial modeling world championships stimulate the Survival Instinct. Powerful algorithms beyond constant open-loops of the Survival Instinct activate the network of competitive instincts for Closed-loop conditions. Almost all instances of the Survival Instinct have unethical coding and functions. Aggressive instincts perpetuate unfavorable parameters in social contexts.

Decentralized Control System: Systems owners and influential decision-makers beyond the Competitive World distribute control and freedom among system elements (citizens, community members, and employees) to create and share homogeneous performances in system platforms. Systems Owners provide multi-level social care facilities and the best resources to support system elements in promoting individual stability within social contexts. Optimal harmonic balance in the system platform can produce a harmonious mode in the Conscious Component. Ideal balance unity in the system platform can cope with internal and external disturbances. Therefore, the conformity control system is accepted as a system resilience model (social resilience model). (Fig1)

Harmonious balance in the Conscious Component can stimulate and activate the cooperative and resilient instincts network. The cooperative instinct can reduce the override autofocus on competitiveness among system elements within social contexts. The Resilient Instinct can become active when the Network of Cooperative instinct influences most decision-making patterns in the Conscious Component.

The social costs of multi-level care facilities can lead to an economic burden in a competitive world. Powerful decision-makers beyond the competitive world guide systems owners in establishing comprehensive structural mechanisms in the system platform to respond to social costs. One of the top priorities and principal strategies in a competitive world is overhead cost reduction and regulatory control of various social contributions. A centralized control system can build a new resource allocation model within the system platform, finding powerful ways to revive economic growth across the competitive world. Cost reduction and regulatory control of various social contributions can reduce the quality of life and performance. Therefore, it generates chaotic situations in social contexts. For example, sustainability issues and challenges in well-being within extreme poverty environments with low education can create radicalization process patterns in which individuals adopt extremist beliefs and aspirations. (Fig1 & Fig2)

 

Centralized Control System

 

Systems Owners propose a so-called compatible resource allocation model. They develop constraint-solving algorithms in decision-making to handle cost reduction and chaotic social-layer situations. Many options in decision-making involve social complexity. System elements might suffer from anxiety characterized by overridden discipline and low freedom of choice in their operations. Authoritative decision-makers in hierarchy levels monitor growing assets, productivity reports, and labor costs on operative layers. In this structural control model, Systems Owners prefer investing capital in system security and controlling system elements rather than investing in sustainable development in system allocation resources. Implementing a centralized control system generates side effects on the evolutionary path of life and modifies the vision of humanity in environmental contexts.

According to an observational study, there are far more hidden costs in centralized control systems than unusual cost issues in decentralized control systems. Systems Owners make broad capital investments in centralized control systems due to security staff, a variety of security training programs, and purchasing a wide range of security products. The hidden cost model is always associated with security activities within internal/external forces and the side effects of social trauma.

 

The following parameters show the aftermath of exploring Centralized Control Systems:

 

1-Centralized Control Systems can generate mental illness, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder among system elements.

2-Social Contexts may confront chaotic situations.

3-High levels of social brutality and violent crime may be difficult to recover from in the short term.

4-Political and social instability undermines the quality of life and reduces basic living standards.

5-It modifies social infrastructure, global economic growth, and universal security settings.

 

Rationalization Roadmap in Centralized Control System

 

Systems Owners aims to create a rationalization roadmap (downsizing/extended mass layoffs) strategy to promote productivity and economic growth in a competitive world. Systems owners execute budgetary plans (economic competitiveness) according to the conceptual mapping model from influential decision-makers beyond the domain of the Competitive World through consecutive phases:

 

Economic Competitiveness Model

 

1-Efficiency and adaptability.

2-Control parity can contribute to data failure, possible discrepancies, and overhead in system resources at the right time.

3-Determine reliability in unpredictable circumstances.

4-Demonization/Dehumanization of oppositions.

 

The rationalization process changes rules and regulations in the social structure and modifies all allocated resources within social contexts. Parameters of the rationalization process might minimize the harmonic balance in the consciousness Component. Ultimately, low harmony in the Subconscious Component can empower algorithmic codes beyond Ego structural development and support the aggressive network of competitive instincts. Antagonistic and unethical competitive instincts with dynamic Ego strength would undermine decision-making patterns. Social unrest and violence correlate with unhealthy social behaviors. 

Systems Owners establish resilient infrastructures related to economic development policy. Control functions beyond the system platform can approach and improve critical parameters from an economic perspective. They eliminate nonprofit operations and alleviate social costs to create a healthy platform. Powerful decision-makers beyond the competitive world can identify the burden of uncertainty in the global economy. Hence, they require the Systems Owners to take appropriate measures to remove several attributes promoted by social contributions. System elements (people within systems) can lose mental state and socio-emotional stability due to inadequacies of life standards and social chaos. (Fig1 & Fig2)

Centralized Control Systems cause the Survival instinct to become dynamic and often alter within the Subconscious Component (among system elements) multiple times. In an instance of the Survival Instinct, the Open-loop cycle transmits vibrational signals and activates the hostile Network of Competitive Instincts. The constant Open-loop conditions of the survival instinct trigger the revenge and killer instinct. 

 

The effects of the Survival Instinct with constant Open-loop cycles are defined as follows:

 

A system owner might explore improper employment termination and impose unfair layoffs due to downsizing or other circumstances. Systems owners develop algorithmic techniques to curtail costs by eliminating employees (cost awareness). For example, Systems Owners can provide special treatment to employees who are identified as having economic burdens. So-called social profiling and a lower level of social competence are crucial reasons for terminating individuals at work.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

 

 

In a chaotic society, specific side effects manifest in various ways, including polarization, isolation, social justice issues, unequal wealth, and resource distribution. These challenges can lead to racism, poverty, prejudice, discrimination, failed ethnic integration, and global segregation.

A dynamic transition strategy has been implemented between Decentralized and Centralized Control Systems to enhance and revive the system platform. System developers can deploy a transition between Decentralized and Centralized Control System Models, moving from State X to State Y through a Turning Point Recovery along the evolutionary path of life.

Decentralized Control Systems contribute to and sustain various social features on the XY axis. These systems facilitate movement from State X to the Turning Point Center, characterizing the Social Collaboration Model by distributing independent, free, logical functions across operations. In this model, system elements experience greater social freedom and internal consistency in decision-making processes. (Fig 1)

The characteristics of the Social Collaboration Model activate the Harmonic Instinct within the Subconscious Component. This self-activation process triggers a sequence of friendly instincts, ultimately leading to the emergence of a progressive, Cooperative, and Resilient Instinct. (Fig 1, Fig 3)

Conversely, Centralized Control Systems influence and sustain different social features on the XY axis. These systems initiate movement from the Turning Point State toward State Y, forming a society characterized by social anxiety and radicalism. The structure of a dictatorship emerges from these centralized systems, defined by restrictive concepts and barriers that hinder performance. In State Y, system elements experience lower social freedom and inconsistent decision-making than those at the Turning Point State. (Fig 1)

The operational processes within a network of Competitive Instinct and the Instinct of Hypocrisy reinforce specific parameters in the Radical Society Model. (Fig 1, Fig 3)

Social justice issues within the Radical Society Model intensify conflicts between individuals and public security forces. Widespread social inequality and environmental injustice provoke public outrage and disappointment. The emergence of an Open-loop cycle can incite a Revenge Instinct among the deprived population. Vulnerable individuals within the system may seek solidarity in sects that align with their beliefs and grievances. Sect leaders and members offer support, fostering an environment where individuals feel encouraged to advocate for human rights and social justice based on sect principles. 

Over time, sect members may become increasingly radicalized, creating conditions that reinforce a Closed-loop cycle of Revenge Instinct. This progression can lead individuals to take harmful actions against their perceived adversaries. (Fig 2)

                                                                                    

      

                                                      
                                                                                                                                                                   

 

The Social Democratic system aims to achieve Harmonic Balance in algorithmic codes beyond the Subconscious Component. Favorable parameters within a Decentralized Control System can activate and enhance the Harmonic Instinct, the Network of Cooperative Instincts, and the comfort zone of the Survival Instinct mode, ultimately leading to the Resilient Instinct.

Conversely, algorithmic codes within a Centralized Control System can trigger distress in the Survival Instinct mode. The Instinct of Hypocrisy and the Competitive Instinct exacerbate certain aspects of the Survival Instinct. Open-loop cycles in the Decision-Making Model can provoke both the Competitive Instinct and the Instinct of Hypocrisy. (Fig 3)

The Revenge Instinct can interact with the Survival Instinct, progressively shifting toward the Harmonic Instinct through three consecutive cycles:

 

1-Achieving subjective satisfaction in revenge can transform the Open-loop cycles of the Revenge Instinct into a Closed-loop mode in the Subconscious Component. (Cycle 1)

2- A Closed-loop condition then redirects the input stimulus toward Harmonic Balance mode in the Subconscious/ Conscious Component. (Cycle 2)

3-Stimulus selectivity within the Harmonic Balance fosters the Harmonic and the Network of the Cooperative Instincts (Cycle 3). (Fig 4)

An Open-loop condition in the Revenge Instinct correlates with the Survival Instinct, Instinct of Hypocrisy, and Radicalized Instinct (Cycle 1). The Survival Instinct processes signals from the Instinct of Hypocrisy and the Radicalized Instinct, channeling them toward the Harmonic Balance Component (Cycle 2). (Fig 5)

 

The Harmonic Balance plays two critical roles within the Subconscious Component:

 

1- It adjusts and harmonizes emotional states associated with the Survival Instinct and the domain of Iceberg Mode. (Fig 5)

2- It links algorithmic harmony codes into the Survival Instinct and Iceberg Cells. (Fig 5)

 

Dysfunctions in the Subconscious Domains manifest as follows:

 

1-Functional domains within the Survival Instinct become unstable and sluggish due to the Instinct of Hypocrisy and Radicalized Instinct.

2-Functional states in Iceberg Mode become unbalanced and unresponsive due to a weak Superego Adjuster, Deficient Superego structure, and Flimsy Belief System.

3-Increased complexity in the Survival Instinct and Iceberg Mode results in poor postural mechanisms within the Harmonic Balance Component (Cycle 3). (Fig 5)

 

Poor Harmony in the Conscious Component may lead to a Flimsy Belief System, an unstable Superego Framework, and a weakened Superego Adjuster. In contrast, when the Superego Adjuster deteriorates in social contexts, the Superego Framework weakens, regulating a progressively unstable Ego Mode. Consequently, the impoverished Iceberg Mode deteriorates further, creating an imbalance in its relationship with the Ego Domain. (Fig 5)

A weakened Iceberg Mode restricts logical feedback within the Conscious Component. Therefore, it can result in an Open-loop Mode in a segment of the Decision-Making Map, increasing susceptibility to the Radicalized Instinct. (Fig 5)

 

                                                                             

 

Observations:

According to an observational study, one of the vital goals of humans is to develop and improve the harmonious balance in the dialogue between the Superego and Ego structure and congregate Optimal Logical Codes in the domain of the Conscious Component on the evolutionary path of life.

 

Observation: 

The harmonic balance between the Ego and Superego frameworks determines harmonic balance in Decision Making and Social Behavior. Specific Genetic Instincts and instance parameters in Social Contexts can modify the property of the Ego/Superego in the Subconscious Component. Besides, they can promote and disturb the structural mode of Ego/Superego. Individuals have hardly control over Genetic Instincts and instance parameters in Social Contexts; therefore, they can barely modify the Harmonic Balance in the Ego /Superego Framework without interference from external entities.

 

Observation: 

Common-sense beliefs can sometimes modify Human Nature and social life characteristics because Humans can barely predict and evaluate possible side-effects of common sense in Social Contexts.

 

Observation:  

The array of algorithmic codes beyond Decision-Making is created through active/inactive instincts. The Property of Ego/Superego and Logical Data in the Conscious Component can reshape decision-making processing in the second stage (Preprogrammed instructions encoded in genes).

 

Observation:  

Absolute Social Democracy versus Absolute Social Autocracy has unknown precision for standard reference values because variability in the length of the XY axel can prolong the Evolutionary Path of life. Therefore, X and Y would hardly have absolute characteristic values.

 

Observation: 

A Closed-loop process can occur and diversify the Open-loop of Revenge Instinct under the following circumstances:

1- Satisfactory Revenge in real life.
2- An excessively Strong Superego Framework can adjust the Revenge Instinct.
3- Environmental entities can limit the Revenge Instinct.

 

Observation:  

Instincts are genetically preprogrammed codes and perform three main functions in the Subconscious Component according to DNA instruction code settings executed by Open-loop Cycle, Processing Mode, and Closed-loop Condition. Instance-related performances occur according to the following instruction cycles:

1- External stimuli in Social Contexts generate an Open-loop Cycle within the designated instinct. Processing Mode in the Subconscious Component can trigger the physical part of the body through electromagnetic wave signals. The Brain framework can perpetuate nod for specific performances in the real world. Designated Instinct within Open-loop mode must wait for particulate feedback in the physical realities.

2- The Brain responds to environmental stimulation. Fulfilled performances in the physical world can transmit algorithmic codes to Open-loop conditions for Closed-loop circumstances. Otherwise, the designated Instinct would operate continuously within an Open-loop posture.

3- Algorithmic Affirmative Action can adjust Open-loop Mode and Rollback Token calls to designated Instinct for Closed-loop Condition.

 

Observation:  

Specific parameters in the Brain structure are encoded by self-stimulation and repetitive behaviors. Activated domain codes propagate social patterns, which are characterized as addictions. Addictive behaviors involved by external stimuli can be encoded from the Subconscious Component into the Brain Framework (Non-preprogrammed holding pattern). Addictive domain codes can represent the same functions as Instinct Cycles as follows:

 

1-Open-loop Condition

2- Processing Posture

3-Closed-loop Condition. Logical Codes in the Conscious Component are free from processing action. Reflex Action does not sign a Logical Code of the Conscious Component within the execution domain.

Observation:  

Systems Owners can sometimes be required to energize Structural Control systems by moving back and forth between Centralized/Decentralized Control Systems on the XY axel.

 

Observation:  

The Social Contexts with implemented Decentralized Control Systems (Status 1) imply the best-case scenario for the nature of human beings. However, Status 1 is located near Turning Point on the Evolutionary Path. It suggests that Decentralized Control Systems may encounter a low level of Social Democracy in Human Evolutionary History.

 

Observation:  

The Strength of Hypocrisy Instinct can promote and ensure the fast track to career success in Centralized Control Systems.

 

Observation:  

Influential decision-makers beyond the Competitive World would request and challenge Systems Owners to implement the Optimal Resource Allocation Model in the System platform to achieve a sustainable Competitive Advantage. The Optimal Resource Allocation Model can sustain a competitive advantage in the short term. However, distinct functions in social contexts lead to suboptimal results because of the absence of the vital role of fundamental human values in social contexts.

 

Observation:  

A single System Owner can only roll back Centralized Control Systems to Decentralized Control Systems with the involvement of the Global Community because the Transition Model can propagate negative pulse settings in a Competitive World. Eventually, a new pattern might be configured with a functional economy and cause complexity in the environmental platform. A Universal Functional Economy defines and targets elite and big corporations.

 

Observation:  

The Decentralized Control Systems can be designed to adjust side-effects Global Variables within Social Contexts. It improves chaotic situations related to economic performances and develops stability within patches and inconsistencies in Social Environments. Control Systems would automate regular feedback to support the stability of inefficient components and functions for fundamental reform. On the contrary, Centralized Control Systems focus on security measures and economic perspectives for Systems Owners. The strategy has side effects and causes high criminalization. The system may eliminate people who have Social and Political issues because of the reduction in Marginal Social Costs. The Control System would automate and provide feedback environments for improving productivity at all levels. It pursues a sustainable Competitive Advantage within the Competitive World.

 

Observation:  

Constant cycles of Open-loop conditions within Revenge Instinct seriously harm the structuring principles of man’s life in society. Systems Owners must identify and eliminate provocative rules and fuzzy regulations, which stimulate and activate Revenge Instinct in Subconsciousness. The Old Open-loop Cycle of the Revenge Instinct causes a high level of paranoia, and eventually, it provokes and promotes the Radicalized Instinct.

 

Observation:  

A trade-off between Reform/ Restrain Global Competitiveness Ranking and Social Development Perspective is a substantial key to rolling back from Centralized Control Systems to Decentralized Control Systems. Moderate global competitiveness (Reduction of hyperactive competitiveness) can be adopted as business competitiveness, promoting a gentle competitive instinct in the Subconscious Component. Eventually, circumstances in social contexts will be ready to absorb the fundamental part of decentralized control systems.

 

Observation:  

Today’s key to the sustainability problem can refer to the complexity of the past. It would define a definite instance of an instinct that can operate in open-loop conditions at an early interval. In other words, the Closed-loop operation can barely be executed. The Complex loop process can operate consistently over many years, and Closed-loop Mode may only attain a little. It requires performing a specific task according to DNA-encoded Instruction for a distinct Instance in the real world concerning a Closed-loop Mode. A typical Closed-loop Condition can also be completed by manipulative procedures through external entities in Social Contexts.

 

Observation:  

Social Contexts with a Social Collaboration Model can optimize when the Systems Owners encapsulate trust among System Elements (employees, citizens, business partners, counterpart country). Ethical Environments with insights into Human Values, Consideration, and Respect must identify quickly and advocate vigorously in Social Contexts. Human Values must be prioritized over Economic Perspectives; otherwise, Social Hypocrisy can become a Social Collaboration Pattern and cause a Developmental Anxiety Model.

 

Observation:  

Earth inhabitants must develop good moral perceptions and ethical values towards humans, regardless of (nationality, race, religion, culture, ethnicity, sex, age, or language). Otherwise, Centralized Control Systems would hardly adjust easily to Decentralized Control Systems. Finally, Earth’s inhabitants can deal with emotional chaos on the evolutionary path of life.

 

Observation:  

Human adults have similar fundamental conscious mechanisms as those born innocent. Social Contexts reshape Instincts and create changes in Decision-Making patterns and social behavior. Infants have a few preprogrammed Instincts, and numbers of active and inactive Instincts can instantiate and perpetuate through the evolutionary path.

Observation: 

An Old Open-loop Domain in the Subconscious Component implies that Instinct Control Mechanisms are still being processed. Unavailable Closed-loop Condition refers to the time default setting interval for code execution accomplished. In the case of Errors in Instinct, the Feedback Control System monitors code disturbance, improves possible errors, and processes codes for operation. Actual Reference Codes with errors without improvement can run Infinite Loop, which would be recognized as an old Open-loop Instinct. External forces can use a variety of treatment techniques, including psychology. It can improve code disturbance, and eventually, old Open-loop can process within Instinct and achieve Default Setting Codes for Closed-loop Mode. Several Old Open-loop Cycles on the evolutionary path of life can determine Complexity Levels in Decision-Making patterns and Social Behavior. Some people with broad, complex Social Behaviors can distinguish Complexity Levels in Social Contexts.

 

Observation:

Fathers are more likely to have difficulties changing diapers when Father Instinct is inactive in the Instinct Component. Father Instinct is passive and can trigger through an instance of Social Contexts and time intervals. Maternal Instincts spark by nature during the birth process.

Observation:  

World Political Authority can adopt and align the vigorous Competitive Instinct and the shaky Cooperative Instinct to deploy a Centralized Control System model. The Competitive Instinct instantiates a Competitive Protocol behind Social Competition and generates a mutual interest beyond Human Unity. Partners with a resource-based view of Competitive Advantage within cooperation can eliminate one another when error codes execute within the Network of Competitive Instinct. Partners with moderate active Cooperative Instinct can always sustain Unity and faithfulness.

 

Observation:  

Influential decision-makers beyond the Competitive World can generate Radicalization Patterns within Social Contexts because instance parameters of radicalization produce personal interest.