The paradoxical
nature of the Survival Instinct possesses friendly and unfriendly functions within
the Subconscious Component. The favorable algorithmic codes operating beyond
the Survival Instinct play a vital protective role, safeguarding humans from
external threats. Instincts in Open-loop cycles can invoke the Survival
Instinct when they need to complete a Closed-loop cycle mode, mainly when
resource starvation was allocated previously within the domain of the old
Open-loop instinct. The Survival Instinct, in turn, engages, rescues, and calls
other proactive instincts to process and fulfill Closed-loop requirements.
However, adverse
algorithmic codes beyond the domain of the old open-loop cycle of Survival
Instinct can send false
signals of the Open-loop cycle to other instincts that possessed previously the
old open-loop cycle instincts for a long time so that perpetuating fake processing
codes evolve into a vicious cycle within the Instinct Component because
external entities do not stimulate instincts for an open-loop processing cycle.
As a result, decision-making is unnecessary for responding to fake signals, and
it causes a vicious cycle of instincts that leads to self-destruction patterns
in humans, disrupting behaviors on the evolutionary journey of life.
Observation:
Each open-loop processing instinct within the Instinct Component
can be assigned to the traditional open-loop instinct cycle domain. The
phenomena of allocation in the old open-loop instinct cycle suggests that the
open-loop processing cycle failed to reach closed-loop cycle conditions within
a single instinct, leaving the designated instinct in starvation mode. Such a
condition can negatively impact decision-making patterns, particularly when the
designated instinct becomes entangled with future processing cycles. In a
worst-case scenario, the decisions of systems owners could worsen conditions
and reshape the circumstances in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment