Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The criteria in multi-system integration and abstract conclusion

There are numerous incidents of indefinite outcomes in multi-system integration. Promoting effective performance requires sometimes system integration. The criteria beyond multi system integration describe as following:

•Faster product delivery into wider markets.
•Stimulate activities and transactions with external forces.
•Effective operations.
•Cheaper product and service to customers.
•System innovation.
•Empower system authority to have better control & security in competition environments.
•Hamper system bankruptcy.
•Reduce system vulnerability.
•Full-fortification phase and extend cooperation in many different areas with allies in the same political system.
•Eliminate competitors in larger system boundary environments.
According to observational study is ethnographic approach can be appropriated option to conduct as a case study prior to system integration. This approach is useful because it helps to detect invisible entities in system environments and produce more transparency in system behavior and culture than other system study approaches; however, System authority would not exploit an ethnographic approach because performing a study process compels long time to achieve the relevance goal study and it is not cost-effective analysis.
Abstract conclusion implies to one single failure in parameters on system integration, which can lead to halt completely whole system activities. Invisible entities can spread rapidly cross system boundary.
At this juncture, system owner may invest in either an ethnographic approach or a sub-optimization process. System can operate in short-term if option is a sub-optimization because invisible entities allocate various layers and channels in a multi-system environment.
It costs a lot to optimize frequently global codes and sub-components in a multi-system environment, because every time system goes down allocates certain hidden costs. A Multi-system environment never operates with full potential when selective integration strategies focus on economy possibilities and challenges.
It is still quite popular to involve concurrent execution on all levels subsystem optimization.
The competitive advantage in system integration (Regarding acquiring system integration one-hundred percent): The information activities and routine performances are consistent everywhere in different subsystems. It is easier to find out specific issue because same path of a complicated scenario can observe and detect in all modules. The system improvement modifies issues cross system at the same time. System owner have better control and a holistic view of system performance with associated components in the entire system.
The disadvantage in system integration: One single event can cause system breakdown cross system platform. The value of global variable modification is only solution.
The progressive ethical global codes with ethnographic approach are cheaper model in a multi-system integration.
Observation 1: System owner should focus more on risk assessment guidance for system element performance because it produces more transparency and prediction about system behavior and parameters in mobilization of invisible entities.
Observation 2: System owner suppose to articulate global codes somehow in order to empower system elements and prevent loading of new enterprise activation in present system.

No comments: