Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Criteria in Multi-System Integration and Abstract Conclusion

There are numerous incidents of vague outcomes in multi-system integration. Promoting ineffective performance needs in system integration. Examples based on criteria in multi-system integration are described as follows:
•Faster product delivery into a broad market.
•Stimulate activities and transactions with major representational external forces.
•Operational control focused on tools and techniques outside the system's comfort zone.
•Cheaper products and services to customers.
•Using new technologies related to external changes. 
•Empower system authority to have better control in competitive environments.
•Reduce Bankruptcy by Slashing expenses.
•Minimize system vulnerability through well-known System Partners.
•It requires a full-fortification phase and extends cooperation with allies in the same political standard in many areas.
•Restraint competitors from interrupting customers in larger system boundary environments.
According to observational experiments, an ethnographic approach can be appropriate for conducting a case study before system integration. However, the method process takes a longer time.
Systems owners may invest long intervals of time in either an ethnographic approach or a sub-optimization process. The System Framework can operate in the short term if the option is insignificant because invisible entities allocate various layers and channels in a multi-system environment.
It costs a lot to optimize frequently Global Codes and sub-components in a multi-system environment. Because every time the System Framework encounters a risk breakdown structure, it allocates specific hidden costs. A Multi-system environment only operates with partial potential when selective integration strategies focus on economic possibilities and challenges.
It is still quite popular to involve concurrent execution on all levels of subsystem optimization.
The higher-level integration provides a competitive advantage in the system platform. The information activities and the effectiveness of performances are consistent everywhere in distinct subsystems. High-level integration generates transparency. A similar complicated scenario can be detected in all modules. Therefore, system improvement modifies broad environments in the System Framework simultaneously. System owners have better control and a holistic view of system performance with associated components in the entire System Framework.
The disadvantage of system integration is that a single event can be related to an ongoing process or repeated events that can cause a system deterioration across the system platform. The value of Global Variable modification is the only solution.

No comments:

The Power of Old-Open-Instincts over Logical Data

Harmonic Balance in Conscious/ Subconscious Frameworks can raise awareness and mindfulness to promote the ability to control and stabilize...