Invisible entities within Biological and Non-Biological Systems
can emerge from a single Open-loop mechanism linked to the Network of Competitive
Instincts. In this framework, global variables within Biological Systems
represent pre-programmed instincts. An instinctive behavior pattern is a
specific action that responds to a well-defined stimulus. Such behavior is
instinctive if it occurs independently of prior experience or learning.
Instincts are complex, inborn behavioral patterns consistently present in every
species member. Algorithmic codes embedded within genetic code, instincts resist
internal and external influences. Biological Systems contain thousands of such
instincts, each targeted at ensuring genetic survival. However, vulnerability
in satisfying these instincts can result in behavioral disorders.
Instinct mechanisms
can be classified into two subtypes:
1-Primary
Instincts tend to dominate
Biological Systems' attention.
2-Secondary Instincts, which create tension and
serve the Primary Instincts, essentially act as mechanisms to fulfill primary
needs for a fundamental aspect of human well-being.
In Figure (1), a primary instinct may represent a
sustainable competitive advantage, while secondary instincts function as
manipulative mechanisms. Figure (1) shows that external stimuli represent
competitive parameters in a complex world. These stimuli are distributed within
internal and external systems, where active global variables receive multiple
signals and respond diversely based on preference. Global variable mechanisms
process stimuli in three stages:
1-Open-loop Cycle
(initiation).
2- Processing
Cycle.
3-Closed-loop Cycle
(response).
In Biological Systems, global variables correspond to Primary
Instinct. External competitive stimuli activate an Open-loop Cycle, challenging
the Biological Systems to prepare for Closed-loop operations. Due to the
complexities of external parameters, significant competency shifts are required
to achieve effective Closed-loop responses. Secondary instincts are directed
toward addressing social context issues, thus facilitating a Closed-loop cycle.
This Secondary Instinct, however, may influence social parameters along the
system's evolutionary path; contagious parameters spread to subcomponents and
related integrated systems, affecting performance across broader biological
networks.
Observations on Competitive Instincts and Social Dynamics
in Biological and Non-Biological Systems
1-Impact of
Religious Parameters on Instincts:
Parameters tied to religious beliefs, linked to specific
instincts, have the potential to modify external stimuli. These stimuli serve
as an instance of Primary Instinct, influencing individuals and collective
behaviors.
2-Secondary
Instincts Concerning Primary Instinct and Closed-Loop Responses:
Secondary Instincts support the Primary Instinct and
facilitate Closed-loop responses. Reflex actions, however, are distinct; they
are simple, automatic responses (like pupil contraction in response to bright
light) requiring minimal Biological Systems involvement.
3-Embedded Basic
Instincts and External Stimuli Evolution:
Basic instincts, embedded in Biological Systems from birth,
become expressions of the Primary Instinct. External stimuli evolve in these
systems' environments and activate in response to environmental and temporal
parameters. Factors like time interval and environmental contexts shape how
quickly and intensely these stimuli influence primary and Secondary Instincts
(see Fig 2).
4-Inherited and
Cultural Parameters in Competitive Instinct:
Genetic inheritance, ancestral parameters, and cultural
reflections collectively influence competitive Instinct, shaping its intensity
and application.
5-Influence of
Religious and Functional Constraints on Competitive Instinct:
In systems associated with religious austerity, the Network
of Competitive Instincts may be reduced, thus altering both internal and
external stimuli. Systems with inherent limitations, such as physical
disabilities, often exhibit a diminished Network of Competitive Instinct, as
observed in cases like blindness.
6-The Network of Competitive
Instincts and Stress Mode:
Biological Systems with a heightened Network of Competitive
Instincts tend to remain in a stressful state focused on gaining or losing an advantage.
This chronic stress may lead to unethical, manipulative behaviors, particularly
in Non-Biological Systems.
7-The Network of
Competitive Instincts within the Subconscious Component:
Competitive Instincts operate within the Subconscious Component,
characterized by a sequence of envy (the initial phase), followed by the Primary
Instinct activation, and ultimately developing into a competition mode during
childhood and adolescence. Over time, personal traits, cultural influences,
environment, and genetics shape the Network of Competitive Instincts.
8-Spread of
Invisible Entities Through Competitive Instinct:
Observational studies suggest that invisible entities
propagate into Non-Biological Systems via the pre-programmed Network of Competitive
Instincts in Biological Systems. Complex manipulative techniques, often costly
and ethically challenging, are employed in competitive environments, disrupting
harmonic balance in the Network of Biological Systems.
9-Role of Ethical
Global Variables in Balancing Competitive Instincts:
Ethical global variables in Non-Biological Systems can be
designed to control the Network of Competitive Instincts, fostering harmony by
minimizing aggressive behaviors and promoting ethical standards.
10-Integration of
Secondary Instincts with Ethical Parameters:
Secondary Instincts incorporate ethical guidelines to
achieve a Closed-loop cycle, often protecting systems from perceived aggressive
actions. However, embedding ethical parameters for proper harmonic balance
within Biological Systems remains challenging and is sometimes exploited by System
Owners for broader social developments.
11-Systemic
Complexity and Optimization by System Owners:
System Owners may impose structured complexities,
optimizing parameters to stabilize systems while balancing structural
intricacies and economic goals.
12-Competitive
and Hypocrisy Instincts in Opponent Demonization:
Systems Owners utilize Competitive and Hypocritical
Instincts to portray opponents negatively, sometimes under the guise of ethical
and humanitarian standards.
13-Demonization
Strategy and Political Cynicism:
System Owners sometimes employ demonization strategies to
protect contextual integrity, though it is often cost-effective to portray
opponents as unethical. Observational studies indicate that such tactics have
increased in hierarchical structures, resulting in heightened political
cynicism.
