The Network of Competitive Instinct is a Source of Invisible Entities

     

                                                                                    

 

Invisible entities within Biological and Non-Biological Systems can emerge from a single Open-loop mechanism linked to the Network of Competitive Instincts. In this framework, global variables within Biological Systems represent pre-programmed instincts. An instinctive behavior pattern is a specific action that responds to a well-defined stimulus. Such behavior is instinctive if it occurs independently of prior experience or learning. Instincts are complex, inborn behavioral patterns consistently present in every species member. Algorithmic codes embedded within genetic code, instincts resist internal and external influences. Biological Systems contain thousands of such instincts, each targeted at ensuring genetic survival. However, vulnerability in satisfying these instincts can result in behavioral disorders.

 

Instinct mechanisms can be classified into two subtypes:

 

1-Primary Instincts tend to dominate Biological Systems' attention.

2-Secondary Instincts, which create tension and serve the Primary Instincts, essentially act as mechanisms to fulfill primary needs for a fundamental aspect of human well-being.

 

In Figure (1), a primary instinct may represent a sustainable competitive advantage, while secondary instincts function as manipulative mechanisms. Figure (1) shows that external stimuli represent competitive parameters in a complex world. These stimuli are distributed within internal and external systems, where active global variables receive multiple signals and respond diversely based on preference. Global variable mechanisms process stimuli in three stages:

 

1-Open-loop Cycle (initiation).

2- Processing Cycle.

3-Closed-loop Cycle (response).

 

In Biological Systems, global variables correspond to Primary Instinct. External competitive stimuli activate an Open-loop Cycle, challenging the Biological Systems to prepare for Closed-loop operations. Due to the complexities of external parameters, significant competency shifts are required to achieve effective Closed-loop responses. Secondary instincts are directed toward addressing social context issues, thus facilitating a Closed-loop cycle. This Secondary Instinct, however, may influence social parameters along the system's evolutionary path; contagious parameters spread to subcomponents and related integrated systems, affecting performance across broader biological networks.

 

Observations on Competitive Instincts and Social Dynamics in Biological and Non-Biological Systems

 

1-Impact of Religious Parameters on Instincts:

Parameters tied to religious beliefs, linked to specific instincts, have the potential to modify external stimuli. These stimuli serve as an instance of Primary Instinct, influencing individuals and collective behaviors.

 

2-Secondary Instincts Concerning Primary Instinct and Closed-Loop Responses:

Secondary Instincts support the Primary Instinct and facilitate Closed-loop responses. Reflex actions, however, are distinct; they are simple, automatic responses (like pupil contraction in response to bright light) requiring minimal Biological Systems involvement.

 

3-Embedded Basic Instincts and External Stimuli Evolution:

Basic instincts, embedded in Biological Systems from birth, become expressions of the Primary Instinct. External stimuli evolve in these systems' environments and activate in response to environmental and temporal parameters. Factors like time interval and environmental contexts shape how quickly and intensely these stimuli influence primary and Secondary Instincts (see Fig 2).

 

4-Inherited and Cultural Parameters in Competitive Instinct:

Genetic inheritance, ancestral parameters, and cultural reflections collectively influence competitive Instinct, shaping its intensity and application.

 

5-Influence of Religious and Functional Constraints on Competitive Instinct:

In systems associated with religious austerity, the Network of Competitive Instincts may be reduced, thus altering both internal and external stimuli. Systems with inherent limitations, such as physical disabilities, often exhibit a diminished Network of Competitive Instinct, as observed in cases like blindness.

 

6-The Network of Competitive Instincts and Stress Mode:

Biological Systems with a heightened Network of Competitive Instincts tend to remain in a stressful state focused on gaining or losing an advantage. This chronic stress may lead to unethical, manipulative behaviors, particularly in Non-Biological Systems.

 

7-The Network of Competitive Instincts within the Subconscious Component:

Competitive Instincts operate within the Subconscious Component, characterized by a sequence of envy (the initial phase), followed by the Primary Instinct activation, and ultimately developing into a competition mode during childhood and adolescence. Over time, personal traits, cultural influences, environment, and genetics shape the Network of Competitive Instincts.

 

8-Spread of Invisible Entities Through Competitive Instinct:

Observational studies suggest that invisible entities propagate into Non-Biological Systems via the pre-programmed Network of Competitive Instincts in Biological Systems. Complex manipulative techniques, often costly and ethically challenging, are employed in competitive environments, disrupting harmonic balance in the Network of Biological Systems.

 

9-Role of Ethical Global Variables in Balancing Competitive Instincts:

Ethical global variables in Non-Biological Systems can be designed to control the Network of Competitive Instincts, fostering harmony by minimizing aggressive behaviors and promoting ethical standards.

 

10-Integration of Secondary Instincts with Ethical Parameters:

Secondary Instincts incorporate ethical guidelines to achieve a Closed-loop cycle, often protecting systems from perceived aggressive actions. However, embedding ethical parameters for proper harmonic balance within Biological Systems remains challenging and is sometimes exploited by System Owners for broader social developments.

 

11-Systemic Complexity and Optimization by System Owners:

System Owners may impose structured complexities, optimizing parameters to stabilize systems while balancing structural intricacies and economic goals.

 

12-Competitive and Hypocrisy Instincts in Opponent Demonization:

Systems Owners utilize Competitive and Hypocritical Instincts to portray opponents negatively, sometimes under the guise of ethical and humanitarian standards.

 

13-Demonization Strategy and Political Cynicism:

System Owners sometimes employ demonization strategies to protect contextual integrity, though it is often cost-effective to portray opponents as unethical. Observational studies indicate that such tactics have increased in hierarchical structures, resulting in heightened political cynicism.