Starvation Instincts Cause Severe Trauma

The domain of deadlock of instincts can perpetuate complexity in decision-making patterns and social behaviors in surroundings when Control Mechanisms and Protocols of an instinctual cycle face challenges in resolving issues on the evolutionary path of life.

 

An Instinctual Cycle: Control Mechanisms and Protocols

 

A single instance of instinct operates through three interconnected cycle control mechanisms, enabling communication between the Subconscious Component and the physical world.

 

1-First Cycle – Stimulation and Initiation (Open-Loop Initiation)

 

The brain framework receives and interprets environmental stimuli, activating a specific instinct within the Subconscious Component. Thus, the first cycle begins with an open loop, where the instinct is triggered in response to contextual inputs within the physical world.

 

2-Second Cycle – Execution and Feedback (Processing Cycle)

 

Once activated, the instinct transmits encoded instructions through the brain to the physical body, prompting an action. The outcome of this action in the external environment generates feedback that is transmitted back to the Subconscious Component.

 

2.1-If the action results in negative feedback, the instinct sensor adjusts by modifying the algorithmic code and reinitiates the action. This loop may repeat multiple times until the action is contextually successful.

 

2.2-If the feedback remains consistently negative, the cycle risks entering a deadlock state, resulting in what can be termed Instinctual Starvation. Alternatively, the instinct may become trapped in an Old open-loop cycle, repeating without resolution beyond a certain temporal threshold.

 

Third Cycle – Confirmation and Closure (Closed Loop Process)

 

The instinct sensor confirms the successful protocol when the action results in positive feedback. Thus, it triggers the third cycle, reinforcing and stabilizing designated instinct. This phase completes a Closed-loop cycle of instinct, where the response pattern is consolidated and stored for future adaptive behavior.

 

The general definition of the instinctual cycle

 

The instinctual cycle control mechanism begins with initiating an Open-loop cycle and a subsequent processing cycle. When environmental feedback aligns positively with the expected outcome, the process evolves into a Closed-loop cycle, achieving the goal state. However, the complexity encountered during processing can introduce new open-loop processes, particularly when resolution is delayed or unattainable.

When multiple open loops are active simultaneously, they attend multiple cue orders, operating beyond the core instinct mechanism, and engage in problem resolution by transmitting signals to the Survival Instinct. Acting as an emergency override system, this instinct mobilizes the Network of Competitive Instincts to push for Closed-loop resolution.

In such dynamic conditions, active instincts may call upon one another to coordinate and achieve an optimal Closed-loop mode. The outcome of these processes largely depends on the balance between active and inactive instincts across both Competitive and Cooperative Instinct Networks. The specific configuration and activation of distinct instinctual instances are critical to determining whether a Closed-loop condition can be realized.

Biological systems may struggle to make optimal decisions when entrapped in Old open-loop cycles, which are states of unresolved or stalled instinctive processes. As these cycles persist and intensify, they signal the Survival Instinct, reflecting a condition of psychological algorithms or behavioral starvation. The Dominant Active Killer Instinct may emerge within the competitive instinct network, aggressively seeking to resolve the loop by mobilizing related instincts to fulfill immediate survival or territorial objectives.

However, when the Cooperative Instinct Network lacks sufficiently active or optimal instincts, the Killer Instinct and its affiliated aggressive drives may go unchallenged. These instincts then influence the Decision-Making Map, embedding hostile and destructive algorithmic codes into behavioral patterns. As a result, dynamic social behaviors may shift dramatically, especially in environments where algorithmic codes of ethical regulation by cooperative instincts are absent or fuzzy. This imbalance fosters pathological conditions, wherein extreme behaviors, such as suicide or mass violence, become perceived as normalized or adaptive responses. These are manifestations of unresolved, aggravated instinctual starvation embedded in old open-loop cycles that have overridden algorithmic codes of cooperative regulation.

 

                                                                                                                                                          

 

 

Observation 1:

The configuration and strength of the Superego and Ego frameworks play a pivotal role in escalating or regulating Old open-loop instincts. These frameworks also shape the characteristics and responsiveness of various Instinct Networks, influencing whether instincts become aggravated, repressed, or harmonized.

 

Observation 2:

When the aggressive tendencies of the Killer Instinct Network are weakened and partially integrated with cooperative instincts, they may align with a partially developed or compromised Ego structure. However, this integration may destabilize under specific social or psychological pressures, contributing to anomalous behaviors and hermit tendencies.

 

Observation 3:

The Belief System, comprising internalized values, cultural narratives, and existential meanings, profoundly influences the Ego/Superego structures and the functional expression of the Instinct Component. Optimal Belief System can reinforce balance in the Subconscious Component, and suboptimal exacerbates internal conflict and instability.

 

Observation 4: 

In extreme cases, the Dominant Active Killer Instinct may seek to resolve long-standing Old open-loop instincts through acts of self-destruction, interpreting such behavior as the only available path to achieving a Closed-loop resolution under conditions of severe existential or social deadlock.

 

Algorithmic Codes, Instinct Networks, and Human Evolutionary Dynamics

Algorithmic codes embedded within the aggravated Old open-loop instinct mechanisms are critical determinants of the human evolutionary trajectory. These codes operate through an invisible module within the Subconscious Component, functioning as an extension or instance of the Brain Framework. Executed beneath conscious awareness, these algorithmic codes are transmitted via vibrational frequencies from the Subconscious Component to the physical brain. Importantly, humans are mainly unaware of decision-making processes outside the body structure, yet these processes deeply influence behavioral patterns and life direction.

Key observations

 

Observation 1:

When the domain of Old open-loop instincts activates the Survival Instinct within the Subconscious Component, the Conscious Component’s logical data is often excluded from the Decision-Making Map. During these critical short intervals, aggressive instincts within the Network of Competitive Instincts may rapidly attempt to resolve multiple open-loop states and reach a Closed-loop Condition, often under intense internal pressure.

 

Observation 2:

The characteristics of the Killer Instinct Network within the Subconscious Component are central to determining whether an individual may engage in hostile or destructive behaviors in their environment. However, the Ego Structure and the Cooperative Instinct Network can act as regulatory forces, possibly modifying decision-making patterns, especially during harmful or intrusive thought phases.
The strength of the Killer Instinct Network strongly influences the scale of social impact, ranging from minor irritability to large-scale behavioral disruptions.

 

Observation 3:

Globalization amplifies the interconnectedness of diverse social structures, resulting in pattern convergence across distant regions. Thus, seemingly trivial social dynamics or lifestyle shifts in one part of the world may mirror or propagate to others. The widespread adoption of suboptimal lifestyle patterns in one cultural domain can influence global human behavior.

 

Observation 4:

As a result of these global patterns, humans face growing challenges in managing vulnerabilities within their lifestyles. These vulnerabilities are not merely individual but embedded in the structural inefficiencies of the global social system.

 

Observation 5:

The Ego and Superego Frameworks are not solely developed postnatally. They preexist before entering the physical world, potentially encoded through vibrational, archetypal, or transpersonal templates that shape early instinctual and cognitive architectures.