Compromised Discussion Dependency Between the Opposite Sex

One of the key factors influencing the rational compromise process between men and women lies beyond conscious deliberation and is rooted in functional mechanisms of the Subconscious Component. These mechanisms consist of algorithmic characteristics associated with gender instincts and Iceberg cells within the Subconscious Component. Preprogrammed algorithmic codes of gender instincts, operating beneath the Subconscious Component, extend beyond the Conscious Component and shape distinct functional processes that influence individual decision-making patterns.

Previous studies on gender instincts and paradoxical social behaviors have highlighted the role of subconscious processes in interpersonal dynamics. Building on this foundation, the present observational study explores how the algorithmic properties of the Ego and Superego structures may be applied to Iceberg cells within the non-physical domain. These structures influence how individuals of opposite sexes perceive rational compromise, seek common ground, and arrive at mutually acceptable solutions in the physical world. (Fig. 1, 2, 3)

Algorithmic codes embedded within Iceberg cells emerge from the internal dialogue between the Ego and Superego structures. The Superego functions as an instance of a Network of Cooperative Instincts, while a Superego Adjuster provides contextual feedback derived from social environments. In contrast, the Ego structure operates as an instance of a Network of Competitive Instincts. (Fig. 1, 2, 3)

The relative dominance, subordination, or balance between the Ego and Superego within the subconscious domain plays a critical role in shaping rational compromise during dialogue between men and women. A dominant Ego framework within the Subconscious Component can weaken fundamental principles of rational compromise, often resulting in rigid or antagonistic outcomes. Conversely, a dominant Superego structure, or a balanced interaction between Ego and Superego, creates flexible algorithmic conditions that facilitate rational compromise, promoting harmony and sustainable coexistence within relationships along the evolutionary trajectory of life.

 

                                                                                  

                                                                               

                                                                     

                                                                             

As summarized in Table 1 below, different configurations of Ego and Superego dominance in the Subconscious Component can propagate signals within Iceberg cells in the non-physical domain, corresponding to distinct compromise outcomes between a couple in the physical world:

Domain	Men	Women	State of Compromise
Iceberg cells	Ego dominance	Ego dominance	Non-compromise of principles
Iceberg cells	Ego dominance	Superego dominance	A potential compromise with subordination
Iceberg cells	Superego dominance	Ego dominance	A potential compromise with subordination
Iceberg cells	Superego dominance	Superego dominance	Compromise
Iceberg cells	Harmonic dialogue	Harmonic dialogue	Compromise

                                                                               

                                                                                      Table 1

Table 1 description:

1-A potential compromise with subordination refers to a relational state in which an individual with a dominant Superego and a strong inclination toward compromise may remain in a relationship that involves asymmetrical power dynamics or a tendency to submit to subordination.

2-Harmonic dialogue implies a balance of power between the Ego and Superego structures.

 

Observation 1: 

The power dynamics between the Superego and the Ego Frameworks can also be applied to sexual perspectives, including how homosexual and bisexual individuals experience compromise and internal conflict.