The Instinct Component encompasses a vast conceptual repository, potentially
a billion distinct instinctual programs. While only a few active instincts are
recognizable and functionally aligned with specific submodules of the Subconscious Component, the overwhelming majority remain inactive and
undefined, with obscure or unclassified mechanisms. Uncovering and identifying
these latent instincts and their operational logic could be key to enhancing
human potential and sustainability on Earth.
Humans are
innately equipped with a Network
of Competitive Instincts embedded
within the Subconscious Component. These instincts originate from the
fundamental necessity of survival, life as a continuous struggle against
environmental threats. Supernatural or universal forces ensure that these
instinctual codes are resilient and potent, as they play a critical role in
preserving human life and securing biological persistence.
Beyond the core Survival Instinct, preprogrammed instinctual codes exist to detect
environmental signals through sensory input. These codes determine the
necessity for feedback loops and direct data to appropriate subsystems to
establish Closed-loop
conditions, a functional state that
resolves unmet instinctual needs. When the brain registers an external
disturbance, this signal extends into both the Subconscious and Instinct
Components. A specific instinct can intercept such codes, recognize error
patterns, and initiate an Open-loop
cycle. This cycle processes outward
signals through the brain’s framework to restore equilibrium via
feedback-driven Closed-loop functionality.
Occasionally, a
single instinct may accumulate multiple open-loop cycles over time, intervals
in which needs remain unresolved. These instances reflect starvation modes, where essential feedback signals are absent or
interrupted. Upon identifying persistent open-loop conditions, the default
algorithmic system activates the Survival Instinct to intervene, resolve signal
failures, and re-establish Closed-loop operation.
The Survival Instinct utilizes structured algorithms to:
1-Parse and interpret error codes.
2-Identify responsible instincts.
3-Execute recovery processes to restore
systemic balance by specific instincts.
In this model, error codes are not merely technical glitches; they represent urgent demands,
often interpreted as life-or-death signals. As such, the Survival Instinct may
activate a range of aggressive behaviors within the Competitive Instinct
Network to secure survival. However, when misaligned or overexpressed, these
offensive instincts may extend beyond internal systems and disrupt external
social environments, leading to chaos or destruction.
Critically, when
the Survival Instinct misinterprets signals, especially under severe stress or
misaligned feedback cycles, it may generate fuzzy logic
interpretations, which manifest as hallucinations.
The algorithmic codes beyond a false perception represent an illogical or
maladaptive reading of internal algorithmic programs, often intensified by
social crises.
Conversely,
logical and accurate signal interpretation can activate friendly instincts within the Network of Cooperative Instincts and engage the Conscious Component.
Together, they diagnose issues, promote adaptive behavior, and guide the system
back to a stable Closed-loop state.
Two major factors
contribute to erroneous, antagonistic algorithmic decisions, those most likely
to trigger hallucinations:
1-The quantity of unresolved open-loop cycle of instincts in
starvation mode.
2-The duration over which these starvation cycle of instincts remain
inactive.
Each instinct operates through a
three-phase processing cycle:
1-Initiation: Triggered by stimulation from social or
environmental contexts, data flows from external sensors to the brain structure
and into a specific instinctual node in the Subconscious Component. Initiation marks
the onset of an Open-loop
cycle of instinct.
2-Feedback
Transmission: The algorithmic
codes of designated instinct return a signal automatically through the brain
framework for actions in the physical world, initiating a second processing
cycle.
3-Physical
Execution and Closure: The human
performs a corresponding algorithmic physical action; a satisfactory outcome
triggers a return signal to the brain, completing the third cycle and
confirming Closed-loop
status.
These cycles represent
the dynamic interplay between instinctual preprogramming codes, environmental
stimuli, and feedback-based adaptation mechanisms critical to maintaining
internal coherence and responding appropriately to external conditions. (Fig. 1-4)
Observation 1: Survival Instinct,
Open-Loop Starvation, and the Ego Framework
Prolonged starvation within an open-loop
instinctual cycle, where the instinct mechanism fails to complete its
processing, can activate the default programming of the Survival Instinct. In
such cases, the system is driven to select and deploy offensive instincts
within the Network of Competitive Instincts. The Ego framework consistently
enters a heightened, vigorous mode when an instinct remains unresolved for an
extended period. This energized Ego state becomes a catalyst for mobilizing
aggressive instincts, validating hostile strategies as necessary responses to
protect the biological integrity of the organism.
Observation 2: Hallucinations of the
Survival Instinct and Societal Tragedies
Hallucinations stemming from the Survival
Instinct represent a critical source behind acts of criminalization, suicide,
mass murder, and rampage shootings. In these cases, long-term unresolved
open-loop cycles may be misinterpreted by preprogrammed instinctual codes as
existential threats, triggering emergency measures coded as life-or-death
responses. These distorted interpretations can influence even high-level
decision-makers, manifesting in tragic societal events and collective crises.
Observation 3: Signal Resolution in
the Competitive Instinct Network
The Network of Competitive Instincts
receives urgent signals from the Survival Instinct when older open-loop cycles
reach critical starvation thresholds. The system’s response depends on how the
underlying algorithmic codes interpret these unresolved cycles. The properties
of the instincts involved, whether active or inactive, significantly influence
the trajectory toward restoring Closed-loop equilibrium. Ultimately, the
capacity of the Conscious Component to apply logical codes becomes a decisive
factor in shaping the decision-making process and determining whether the
response will be constructive or destructive.
Observation 4: Human Electromagnetic
Signaling and Bio-Algorithmic Intelligence
Empirical observations reveal that
humans emit low-level electrical signals and possess magnetic fields, which are
detectable by the brain. The body’s DNA frameworks contain unique algorithmic
codes that operate beyond genetic expression and influence the processing of
electrical and magnetic signals. Cells conduct these currents as part of the
integrated biological circuitry. The Subconscious Component leverages these
mechanisms to execute decisions according to its default programming. In this
light, the human organism functions as a biological machine, an organic form of
Artificial Intelligence that operates through layered submodules of the Subconscious
Component, instinctual algorithmic codes, and dynamic feedback loops around an
equilibrium point.
