Compromised Discussion Dependency Between the Opposite Sex

One of the key factors influencing the rational compromise process between men and women lies beyond conscious deliberation and is rooted in functional mechanisms of the Subconscious Component. These mechanisms consist of algorithmic characteristics associated with gender instincts and Iceberg cells within the Subconscious Component. Preprogrammed algorithmic codes of gender instincts, operating beneath the Subconscious Component, extend beyond the Conscious Component and shape distinct functional processes that influence individual decision-making patterns.

Previous studies on gender instincts and paradoxical social behaviors have highlighted the role of subconscious processes in interpersonal dynamics. Building on this foundation, the present observational study explores how the algorithmic properties of the Ego and Superego structures may be applied to Iceberg cells within the non-physical domain. These structures influence how individuals of opposite sexes perceive rational compromise, seek common ground, and arrive at mutually acceptable solutions in the physical world. (Fig. 1, 2, 3)

Algorithmic codes embedded within Iceberg cells emerge from the internal dialogue between the Ego and Superego structures. The Superego functions as an instance of a Network of Cooperative Instincts, while a Superego Adjuster provides contextual feedback derived from social environments. In contrast, the Ego structure operates as an instance of a Network of Competitive Instincts. (Fig. 1, 2, 3)

The relative dominance, subordination, or balance between the Ego and Superego within the subconscious domain plays a critical role in shaping rational compromise during dialogue between men and women. A dominant Ego framework within the Subconscious Component can weaken fundamental principles of rational compromise, often resulting in rigid or antagonistic outcomes. Conversely, a dominant Superego structure, or a balanced interaction between Ego and Superego, creates flexible algorithmic conditions that facilitate rational compromise, promoting harmony and sustainable coexistence within relationships along the evolutionary trajectory of life.

 

                                                                                  

                                                                               

                                                                     

                                                                             

As summarized in Table 1 below, different configurations of Ego and Superego dominance in the Subconscious Component can propagate signals within Iceberg cells in the non-physical domain, corresponding to distinct compromise outcomes between a couple in the physical world:

Domain	Men	Women	State of Compromise
Iceberg cells	Ego dominance	Ego dominance	Non-compromise of principles
Iceberg cells	Ego dominance	Superego dominance	A potential compromise with subordination
Iceberg cells	Superego dominance	Ego dominance	A potential compromise with subordination
Iceberg cells	Superego dominance	Superego dominance	Compromise
Iceberg cells	Harmonic dialogue	Harmonic dialogue	Compromise

                                                                               

                                                                                      Table 1

Table 1 description:

1-A potential compromise with subordination refers to a relational state in which an individual with a dominant Superego and a strong inclination toward compromise may remain in a relationship that involves asymmetrical power dynamics or a tendency to submit to subordination.

2-Harmonic dialogue implies a balance of power between the Ego and Superego structures.

 

Observation 1: 

The power dynamics between the Superego and the Ego Frameworks can also be applied to sexual perspectives, including how homosexual and bisexual individuals experience compromise and internal conflict.

 

Changing Vibrational Frequency within the Conscious Component

Social chaos has the capacity to disrupt and modulate the functional mechanisms of algorithmic codes operating across both the Subconscious and Conscious Components of human systems. These disturbances do not remain localized within individual submodules; instead, they propagate across social, cultural, and environmental contexts, generating persistently low vibrational frequencies among individuals and collectives. Such low-frequency states manifest as fear-driven behaviors, polarization, scarcity thinking, and reactive decision-making.

Within this environment, system owners, whether institutional, technological, or economic actors, often attempt to reclaim suboptimal or misallocated resources. However, these recovery efforts are frequently guided by algorithmic frameworks embedded with the very social biases they originally produced. These wicked algorithmic codes extend beyond explicit global variables on digital and socio-economic platforms, subtly shaping perception, incentives, and behavioral norms. As a result, they reinforce structural inequities while remaining largely invisible to those affected by them.

The interaction between biased algorithms, social instability, and resource misallocation generates multiple hidden vicious cycles. These cycles operate beneath conscious awareness, becoming embedded in the evolutionary trajectory of human life. Over time, they normalize low-frequency emotional and cognitive states, constraining collective imagination, ethical reasoning, and adaptive capacity. The evolutionary cost is not merely economic inefficiency, but a gradual erosion of human agency and coherence across social systems.

Designing an optimal framework for resource allocation within social contexts offers a pathway to interrupt these cycles. By intentionally restructuring incentives, feedback mechanisms, and decision-making architectures, it becomes possible to elevate low-vibrational frequencies into higher-level modes of operation. This transformation depends on strengthening the Superego Adjuster and reinforcing the Superego structure within the Subconscious Component.

The Superego Adjuster functions as a regulatory submodule that integrates ethical awareness, long-term collective well-being, and self-reflective constraint into decision-making processes. When this domain is reinforced, it enables individuals and systems to transcend reactive, fear-based patterns and align behavior with higher-order values such as fairness, responsibility, and sustainability. In turn, the Conscious Component gains stability, clarity, and intentionality, allowing human systems to evolve toward more coherent, adaptive, and high-frequency states of existence.

Ultimately, elevating vibrational frequency is not an abstract ideal, but a systemic outcome achieved through conscious design, ethical recalibration, and the harmonization of subconscious structures with collective evolutionary goals.

 

Observation 1:

Human conscious and subconscious components can be understood as operating across a spectrum of vibrational frequencies within the Conscious Component of being. At the lowest frequencies, the Conscious Framework may manifest through dense, destructive, or antisocial behaviors in the physical world, often labeled as evil. At the highest frequencies, algorithmic codes beyond the Subconscious Component express qualities such as compassion, wisdom, selflessness, and harmony, resembling what many traditions symbolically describe as angelic states of being. These extreme characteristics are not separate species of existence, but different expressions of the same human potential.

Within this framework, humans may be seen as arriving into life with inherent, preprogrammed algorithmic codes, fundamental patterns that influence perception, emotion, cognition, and behavior. Some of these codes incline toward cooperation, empathy, and unity, while others incline toward self-preservation, dominance, or division. Importantly, these programs are not fixed destinies. Instead, they function as latent possibilities that can be activated, suppressed, refined, or rewritten through conscious choice, experience, and environmental influence.

Each individual continuously selects algorithmic codes, whether consciously or unconsciously, which internal programming is allowed to extend into their life path. These selections shape moral orientation, behavioral tendencies, and interpersonal dynamics. As a result, human behavior cannot be reduced to a single deterministic model. The interaction between internal algorithms and external conditions creates a dynamic system in which outcomes remain fluid rather than predetermined.

Because individuals are constantly negotiating between competing internal codes while adapting to changing environmental contexts, their decision-making models remain inherently unpredictable. A person may respond with empathy in one situation and hostility in another, not due to randomness, but due to shifts in which internal programming is being expressed at a given moment. Thus, human behavior emerges from a complex, evolving interplay between algorithmic codes beyond the Conscious Component, selective choices, and circumstance in social contexts, making absolute prediction impossible, and the transformation of decisions is always possible.