The Paradox of Developing Gender Norms

Systems Owners focus on harmonizing System Platforms through articulated Optimal Global Variables, but specific Variables may hardly align with the characteristics of Biological Systems. Therefore, Biological Systems would exercise Suboptimal Codes beyond Global Variables in Social Contexts that may modify Gender Instincts, a life cycle of gender socialization/ stereotyping, and eventually, Decision-Making Models. 

Women can confront gender inequality and social violation through gender-based discrimination. They face abuse and unequal treatment in their wider communities, so Social Complexity can challenge Systems Owners to subset Social Norms through algorithmic codes behind Global Variables. The New Social Norms can generate empathy and Gender equality within activities at work and in Social Contexts.

Women might exercise masculine assignments and possess attitudes for accomplishing specific tasks daily. As a side effect, wielding the New Social Norms of women can modify the Preprogrammed Codes of Gender Instinct and increase male gender norms among women.

This phenomenon causes women to make decisions more and less similar to men. Partially, women feel the same way as men and allocate homogeneous algorithmic codes of Male Gender Instinct.

Heterosexual women who exercise men’s model decision-making have difficulty compromising with Men. Male gender norms within their Instinct Components can perpetuate tendencies to encapsulate Bisexual Emotions in the Subconscious Component (without having intimate sexual relationships with similar sex). Women can get stuck in a particulate domain between the boundaries of Heterosexuality and Bisexuality.

 

Observation:

According to an observational study, these women may get satisfaction and happiness to gain more attention from other women. They focus and compete on appearances/beauty and need confirmation of their attractiveness from other women.

 

Observation:

Predictably, Systems Owners attempt to optimize Global Variables to harmonize and improve various circumstances within Social Contexts in the future; however, each modification in characteristics of Biological Systems can generate complexity and side effects on the evolutionary path of life.

 

Algorithmic Codes Behind the Anger Instinct

The Anger Instinct is part of the Network of the Competitive Instinct, and its functions trigger warning signals in Social Contexts and the Subconscious Component. It initiates when Biological Systems are involved in the uncomfortable zone and external entities stimulate and process action from Sensory Inputs into the Brain Framework to Consciousness. Emotional reactions of Biological Organs can transmit codes to the Instinct Component for handling responses. The Survival Instinct and specific Offensive Instincts within the Network of Competitive Instinct, the Superego and Ego Frameworks, and Logical Data within the Conscious Component aim to operate and achieve Closed-loop Modes. The outcome of concurrence among those units generates Decision-Making Models.

Decision Patterns respond to provocation from system environments, which can depend on what Instinct possesses:

1-An Open-loop Cycle.

2-The outcome of a dialogue between the Superego and Ego Framework saves within Iceberg Cells.

3-The quality of Logical Data allocated and held in the Conscious Component.

 

Therefore, the characteristics of Social Behaviors among Biological Systems differ in the context of anger and various circumstances.

Biological Systems with Cognitive Control would explore the excellent quality of Logical Data in the Conscious Component, the robust Superego Framework, and mobilized instincts without Old Open-loop conditions within the Network of Cooperative Instinct.

Biological Systems with anger aggression behaviors may encapsulate the vicious Ego Framework, inaccurate Logical Data, and organized Instincts with Old Open-loop modes within the Network of Competitive Instinct.

 

Observation:

Active/ Vigorous Instincts within the Network of the Cooperative Instinct can be vibrant and improve Grief/Bitterness for Harmonizing Social Behaviors.

Observation:

Hypnotherapy can modify Old Open-loop Conditions within the Network of Competitive Instinct, enhance Dialogue Codes in Iceberg Cells, and improve Logical Data in the Conscious Component.

Observation:

Humans can develop Critical Thinking Skills through the following steps:

 

1- Don't Believe Everything You Hear.

2-The Critical Thinking is to Consider more than one Point of View.

3- Don't Believe Everything You Think.

4- Ask Questions.

5- Research Deeper.

6- Could you Evaluate your Work?