The Paradox of a Revenge Instinct

An Interdisciplinary Inquiry into Homeostatic Control Systems and Open-Loop Dynamics. This research investigates the interplay between homeostatic control systems and the dynamics of the Survival and Revenge Instincts under open-loop conditions. Specifically, it focuses on the paradoxical function of the Revenge Instinct when it operates outside of its regulated cycle, what may be termed the Old Open-loop instance (starvation mode or deadlock error of specific instincts).

When this Old Open-loop cycle within the Revenge Instinct encounters a critical overload triggered by prolonged threat or unresolved antagonism, it transmits an interrupt signal to the broader Homeostatic Regulation System. These interrupt signals carry a distinct signature, representing the long-duration, unregulated expression of the Revenge Instinct in an open-loop cycle of mode.

Situated within the Network of Competitive Instincts in the Subconscious Component, the Revenge Instinct is often activated by the Survival Instinct in response to external aggression or mistreatment. Once activated, it initiates an open-loop cycle to counter hostile agents and re-establish internal equilibrium, ultimately seeking a return to closed-loop stability within the subconscious framework.

The algorithmic codes embedded beyond the immediate function of the Revenge Instinct are robust. Given sufficient environmental change, these default programming mechanisms are designed to eventually reclose the loop through reconciliation, resolution, or elimination of the perceived threat. However, if external tensions persist or escalate, the open-loop condition remains indefinitely unresolved. The cycle becomes part of the historical or Old Open-loop memory, preserved within the architecture of the Revenge Instinct.

In such persistent states, the Revenge Instinct signals the Survival Instinct to intervene more urgently, particularly when existential threats loom. As a result, secondary or auxiliary offensive instincts are activated under the directive to achieve a new closed-loop configuration. These are defensive in form but aggressive in functional operations.

A critical escalation occurs when adversaries operate under similar Old Open-loop conditions, each maintaining unresolved competitive instincts in the same shared environment. Thus, it leads to the recursive activation of multiple Survival Instinct cycles across opposing agents. The outcome is a compounding system of open-loop aggression seeking resolution through competing closed-loop mechanisms, producing social chaos, systemic instability, and potential calamities.

Nevertheless, embedded within the deeper architecture of instinctual code is a higher-order default mechanism: closed-loop cycles that restore internal coherence and calmness. When successfully re-engaged, these modes can extend their stabilizing influence to the Conscious Component, promoting integration, peace, and clarity.

Observation 1: Mutual Revenge and the Escalation of Competitive Instincts

 

Cycles of mutual revenge between opposing group adversaries can trigger and amplify extreme, unpredictable, aggressive instincts within the Network of Competitive Instincts embedded in the Subconscious Component. These open-loop feedback mechanisms, activated through prolonged hostility, can evolve into expansive and unregulated instinctual chains, leading to unprecedented disruptions in social dynamics. The vicious cycles destabilize group relations and propagate large-scale behavioral anomalies that challenge existing normative structures.

 

Observation 2: Social Anxiety and the Breakdown of Subconscious Regulation

Social anxiety acts as a critical driver in the reactivation and perpetuation of multiple Old Open-loop instinctual cycles. This condition reinforces a rigid Ego structure, inflaming dormant aggressive instincts and disrupting the balance of the Subconscious Framework. When default subconscious values are distorted, the algorithmic codes that typically enable rational decision-making through the Conscious Component are impaired. 

Empirical observations suggest that current environmental stressors, particularly those rooted in economic uncertainty, have compounded this dysfunction. Suboptimal decision-making proliferates, leading to moral ambiguity, degraded human rights, and collective anguish on the evolutionary path. In the modern world, universal competition, especially within the economic domain, has become a dominant source of anxiety. The Survival Instinct of global elites and influential decision-makers becomes entangled in this Network of Competitive Instincts, triggering automated offensive responses that operate without the guidance of higher-order logical processing. These reactions, in turn, expand the reach of centralized control systems that govern complex social phenomena.

 

Observation 3: Global Zombification and Collateral Systemic Harm

At the highest levels of global influence, decision-makers entrenched in competitive survival modes contribute to systemic harm through unchecked strategic aggression, manifesting in unjustified collateral damage war, environmental degradation, poverty, deprivation, and health inequities. This process can be understood as a zombification of the global population: a state in which human agency and consciousness are subdued by institutionalized power, systemic deception, and psychological disempowerment. 

This zombification is perpetuated through technological and ideological platforms that encode social hypocrisy, where selective treatment of human lives reveals a more profound imbalance beyond mere anxiety. Such phenomena indicate a significant breach in ethical homeostasis, driven by aggressive instincts masked as rational governance.

 

Observation 4: Ego-Superego Dynamics and Decision-Making Models

The long-term evolutionary goal of the human species may be viewed as achieving a harmonic balance between the Ego and Superego structures. Effective decision-making requires that instincts be optimally regulated and loaded logical data through the Conscious Component, activating neither excessive aggression nor passive inaction from the Subconscious Component. The dynamic distribution of active versus inactive instincts reveals the health of the Instinctual Component and serves as a diagnostic tool for the integrity of human decision systems. Accumulated logical data within the Conscious Component can be evaluated as evidence of meaningful life experience and successful navigational models on the evolutionary trajectory. 

However, widespread delusions about life purpose and success are often the byproduct of data suboptimality within the Subconscious Framework. Environmental conditions, shaped by overarching global variables and entrenched socio-political constitutions, further limit the possibility of conscious optimization, perpetuating cycles of confusion and dysfunction within global variables (Constitutions).

 

Observation 5: Paranormal Disbelief, Frequency Systems, and Superego Weakening

Human disbelief in abstract or invisible entities, such as metaphysical forces or non-material intelligence, is mainly due to the limitations of sensory perception and a lack of direct interaction with nonphysical data types. As a result, the human experience often excludes the paranormal and the energetic frequency fields that may operate beyond the Subconscious Component. Academic disciplines remain constrained in studying such phenomena, primarily due to these metaphysical systems' unquantifiable and immeasurable nature. The coding structures that govern these abstract realities lie beyond the reach of conventional data frameworks, resulting in a systematic reduction or exclusion of mystical knowledge that is practically unattainable for humans.

The visual abstract of phenomena and disbelief in the powerful hidden frequency within Global Consciousness can challenge humans to be confident in their decision-making models in harsh environments. In such scenarios, the Ego Framework is forced to assume dominance for survival, activating aggressive instincts in response to perceived threats. Over time, the weakening of the Superego structure leads to an erosion of moral clarity and social cohesion, giving rise to unpredictable chaos in collective human behavior.

The Paradox of a Sexual Instinct

This interdisciplinary research explores homeostatic control systems within the domains of Survival and Sexual Instincts, specifically under Open-loop conditions. When the legacy Open-loop cycle of the Sexual Instinct (characterized by starvation mode) encounters overload signals, it transmits an interrupt signal to the homeostasis System. This signal encapsulates the property profile of the Sexual Instinct in prolonged Open-loop states.

The following phases describe the transition of the Sexual Instinct from an Open-loop cycle to a Closed-loop mode within the Subconscious Component:

 

1-Initial Stimuli: Physical sensors in social or environmental contexts detect primary stimuli.

 

2-Neural Transmission: Data is transmitted to the Instinct Component via the brain’s processing frameworks.

 

3-Instinctual Interpretation: Specialized receptors within the Sexual Instinct interpret this input, initiating an Open-loop cycle.

 

4-Automated Response: The processing cycle activates motor responses through physical components, guided by environmental context and brain signaling.

At this stage, the system may follow one of two pathways:

Option 1: Successful Processing

 

Physical organs execute responses in alignment with the Sexual Instinct’s directives. Muscle sensors detect electrical activity from targeted muscle groups (e.g., via skin surface). These electrical impulses transmit signals to the brain, activating specific algorithmic codes corresponding to physical structures. The algorithmic response, triggered through neural stimulation and biochemical interaction, culminates in physiological expressions such as ejaculation or orgasm.

This reaction generates comfort-inducing and relaxation-promoting chemical signals throughout the body. The brain framework processes these signals into frequency transmissions directed toward the Sexual Instinct within the Subconscious Component. The Instinct Receptors decode these frequencies, fulfilling the command to transition the Sexual Instinct into a Closed-loop condition.

 

Option 2: Disturbance and Failure to Process

 

In this pathway, the physical organs attempt to execute the instinctual request, but muscle sensors fail to detect sufficient electrical activity within critical intervals. The resulting electrical impulses transmit failure signals to the brain and the Subconscious Component. The Instinct Receptors interpret these signals as indications of continued Open-loop cycling.

When multiple Open-loop cycles persist within the same instinctual framework, they may accumulate within the domain of legacy ( Old Open-loop cycles, leading to deadlock or starvation modes). In such cases, the Survival Instinct may initiate offensive or compensatory drives to restore Closed-loop balance.

Persistent disturbances in achieving Closed-loop functionality within the Sexual Instinct can impair homeostatic regulation and distort decision-making models. Over time, this may lead to chronic dysfunctions and complex socio-behavioral conditions. Obstruct dysfunctions can cause chaotic situations in social contexts.

 

Systemic Regulation in Open-loop and Closed-loop Conditions

 

Observation 1: Temporal Accumulation of Open-loop Cycles

 

After multiple unsuccessful attempts to initiate a Closed-loop cycle within a Sexual Instance, an Open-loop state can become encoded within the Sexual Instinct over a defined temporal interval. This condition represents a failure of instinctual fulfillment and contributes to instability within the Subconscious Component and social contexts.

 

Observation 2: Entrapment in Old Open-loop Cycles

 

In extreme cases, unresolved Sexual Instances accumulate within the domain of Old Open-loop cycles in the Subconscious Component. This accumulation arises when individuals repeatedly cannot translate instinctual drives into action within the physical world. Such entrapment can lead to chronic dysfunctions and affect systemic coherence.

 

Observation 3: Misalignment Between Algorithmic Codes and Global Variables

 

System Owners (e.g., institutional leaders and policymakers) are responsible for articulating algorithmic codes that operate beyond fluctuating global variables (such as laws or constitutions) to ensure accountability in social systems. However, global variables often exhibit inherent complexity and volatility, which may disrupt the natural processing of Closed-loop cycles, particularly within the Sexual Instinct.

Universal principles, rooted in ethics, morality, and human dignity, stand above mutable systemic constructs. These universal laws support the well-being and balanced processing of fundamental instincts within the Subconscious Component. In contrast, economic agendas and political strategies cannot override or redefine these foundational principles. When System Owners fail to align global variables with algorithmic codes embedded in Universal Law, it reduces accountability, heightened social anxiety, and widespread dysfunction.

 

Observation 4: Limitations of Legal Constructs

 

Legal frameworks and platform constitutions are often unable to effectively adjudicate algorithmic deviations behind criminal behaviors, especially when influential individuals manipulate or bypass the legal system to create harmonic balance to resolve actual problems in social contexts and righteous decisions can be eliminated. In such cases, only Universal Law offers a higher-order reference point for discerning authentic justice and ethical behavior.

 

Observation 5: Degeneration Through Old Open-loop Cycles

 

The domain of Old Open-loop cycles within the Sexual Instinct rarely transitions back to stable and decent Closed-loop conditions. Instead, prolonged starvation-mode states activate aggressive compensatory instincts aimed at resolving the dysfunction, often escalating into systemic chaos.

These antagonistic instincts manifest as social turmoil, behavioral volatility, and tragic disruptions along the evolutionary arc of life. The legacy of unresolved Sexual Instances thus forms a dilemma loop, periodically reactivating and perpetuating cycles of instability. Default recovery mechanism codes beyond the Sexual Instinct are insufficient, and the algorithmic resilience of the Sexual Instinct in such states is notably compromised in social contexts.

 

Observation 6: Brain as Antenna for Algorithmic Codes

 

The brain framework operates analogously to an antenna, capable of expressing, manifesting, and materializing algorithmic codes beyond the Subconscious Component. These codes shape social behaviors and decision-making patterns, bridging internal instinctual regulation and external sociocultural dynamics and social behaviors.

 

Observation 7: The Algorithmic Significance of Ejaculation

 

Empirical observations suggest that one of the most critical algorithmic codes beyond chemical equilibrium in Biological Systems is the electrical impulse of ejaculation. This impulse not only initiates physical release but also generates a state of profound comfort across physical and mental dimensions. It represents a deeply embedded code of instinctual resolution linked to homeostatic balance and emotional equilibrium. The functional mechanisms of the electrical impulse of ejaculations can establish Closed-loop modes within the Sexual Instinct in the Subconscious Component.

 

Observation 8: Definition of A Homeostatically Regulated System

A homeostatically regulated system keeps a harmonious balance within the component, although alternations are allocated in the external environment. In other words, a regulated system is achieved through feedback mechanisms that regulate various physiological variables, such as temperature, blood sugar, and blood pressure, to keep them within optimal range.