Social Hypocrisy and Intangible Factors in Decision-Making

Social hypocrisy can obstruct the functional dynamics of distinct instincts, leaving them in a state of deprivation or starvation. This starvation reinforces the persistence of Old Open-loop cycles within the Subconscious Component. As a result, the Instinct Component begins processing and signaling unrelated or suppressed instincts, leading to the execution of decision-making codes that are misaligned and incompatible with genuine social needs. Consequently, the domain governed by Old Open-loop cycles repeatedly calls upon the Survival Instinct to intervene and rescue various instincts from a deadlock state. However, the Open-loop cycle can remain self-perpetuating due to feedback from actions in the physical world, so it would be challenging to establish a sustainable Closed-loop configuration within distinct active instincts.

In this context, the foundational codes of the Superego Framework challenge and invoke the Survival Instinct to activate dormant or misaligned aggressive instincts. The aim is to realign them with the Network of Cooperative Instincts, which are instincts responsive to environmental demands and conducive to improving unhealthy or imbalanced lifestyles.

 

Hypocrisy is an inherent aspect of social life.

 

Algorithmic codes beyond Instinct Hypocrisy serve as psychological defense mechanisms to protect individuals and societies. However, in doing so, these codes can activate instincts, belief systems, and other modules within the Subconscious Component in ways that contradict the current default values of functional operation. The algorithmic codes generated from logical data within the Conscious Component may inadvertently support the temporary and self-serving strategies of Instinct Hypocrisy, particularly under survival pressure. This phenomenon can be linked to cognitive dissonance and psychological biases that influence decision-making patterns and social behavior. Importantly, this process is not inherently malicious. Instead, it reflects the natural outcome of navigating complex emotions within chaotic or competitive social environments.

Cognitive Dissonance emerges when the Survival Instinct triggers unnatural or non-default instincts that are not initially programmed for the current context and that align with the individual’s belief system. This misalignment produces internal discomfort. To resolve this discomfort, individuals may rationalize their behavior, deny contradictions, or modify the algorithmic codes that structure their belief system and associated submodules to align with their actions. These unnatural instincts disrupt the rational flow of information and promote aggressive, short-term survival strategies. Consequently, they hinder the seamless integration of refined algorithmic logic into the Decision-Making Map, undermining long-term harmony and impeding evolutionary development.

As a result, hypocrisy reinforces the persistence of Old Open-loop instinctual cycles, leading to instinctual malnutrition and the proliferation of elusive or fragmented decision-making codes. Over time, this internal dissonance manifests in social behaviors, aggravating disorders, and amplifying the absurdity of interactions within social contexts.

 

On a global scale

 

Hypocrisy is often engineered and institutionalized by influential decision-makers and elite groups as a strategic tool to maintain control, secure competitive advantages, and sustain a perceived balance within global economic systems. However, the deeper algorithmic codes underlying Global Hypocrisy can destabilize long-term human development, ultimately undermining efforts toward sustainable and harmonious evolution on a planetary scale.

Universal Hypocrisy at the Core of the Emergence of the World

 

The prolonged execution of algorithmic codes underlying Social Hypocrisy can evolve into a more pervasive phenomenon. For example, Chronic Hypocrisy is a condition that gradually reshapes the behavioral dynamics of communities and alters the foundational structure of the entire Instinct Component, including critical submodules within both the Subconscious and Conscious Components.

Systems Owners often cultivate and deploy Social Hypocrisy to secure competitive advantages by manipulating Global Variables. In doing so, social contexts become vessels for hypocritical codes, embedded with the strategic principles of ruling classes and enforced by influential decision-makers. These elements shape daily decision-making patterns within populations, aligning them with the distorted logic of hostile global dynamics and survival-driven motivations.

As a result, the Decision-Making Map becomes populated with codes contradicting the Subconscious Component’s intrinsic nature and the autonomy of free belief systems. This dissonance erodes ethical behavior, weakens societal trust, and degrades the credibility of shared values within system environments.

Ultimately, the cumulative effect of chronic social hypocrisy and systemic deception initiates a reconfiguration of the Global Variables embedded within system platforms. Thus, it can trigger multi-phase transitions across societies, solidifying a paradigm of Universal Hypocrisy at the core of the emergence of the world system.

 

Observation 1:

Offensive instincts can be triggered and executed within the Decision-Making Map under harsh environmental conditions, instinctual deadlocks, and unpredictable disturbances in human life. The Decision-Making Map may default to antagonistic codes in such states, even when robust logical data is available within the Conscious Component. As a result, most individuals instinctively detect internal signals of distress and initiate rescue mechanisms. This process often leads to the automatic activation of aggressive instinctual codes, embedded within the decision-making framework, as a means of survival and adaptation.

Observation 2:

Humans are equipped with inherent algorithmic codes that extend beyond primitive instinctual mechanisms. These deeper codes operate within a spectrum of favorable and unfavorable patterns, influencing the functional mechanisms of instincts that, in turn, embed specific instructions into the Decision-Making Map.

The algorithmic architecture underlying the Belief System plays a pivotal role in modulating the internal dialogue between the Ego and Superego frameworks. This modulation allows for selecting and allocating optimal codes into the Subconscious Component, guiding individuals through complex decisions and ethical considerations.

Simultaneously, the self-regulating mechanisms of the Conscious Component continuously adjust decision-making patterns through the integration of logical codes. Over time, this dynamic interaction results in the unfolding of decision pathways that reflect an accumulating cycle of instinctual signals. These cycles collectively instantiate the Belief System, the latent structures of the Iceberg Cells, and the logical architecture of Consciousness itself.

 

Observation 3:

In understanding the perpetuation and encapsulation of algorithmic codes within the decision-making process, humans must develop conscious awareness of the internal mechanisms shaping their choices. Several critical questions emerge to illuminate this dynamic:

 

1-How many Active/Inactive Instincts contribute shared algorithmic codes executed by the Subconscious Component in decision-making?

2-What is the duration of starvation within the Old Open-loop cycle of instincts before resolution or transformation occurs?

3-What kind of algorithmic outcomes are generated or vibrated within the structures of the Iceberg Cells?

4–Which algorithmic architectures might exist beyond the Belief System and deeper in the Subconscious Component?

5-Which optimal principles are embedded within the logical data housed in the Conscious Component?

6-Which specific instincts are activated or suppressed within the Instinct Component during decision processing?

These reflective inquiries are gateways for decoding the internal logic behind behavioral patterns, psychological resistance, and human adaptation in evolving environments.

Observation 4:

Each submodule within the Subconscious Component possesses the capacity to modulate algorithmic codes that function independently of the conceptual Decision-Making Map. These deeper characteristics shape individual behavior and response patterns over time. The hidden algorithmic blueprint across life stages can be outlined as follows:

 

1-Humans are born with inherent algorithmic codes that extend beyond instinctual drives, residing in the deeper layers of the Subconscious Component.

2–The Belief System begins as a blank slate, free of codes at birth, and gradually gains data through experience.

3–The Ego Framework holds a stable set of algorithmic codes from birth, shaping identity and self-regulation.

4-The Superego Framework begins without embedded codes and gradually internalizes moral, ethical, and societal algorithms through the Superego Adjuster within social contexts.

5-The logical data within the Conscious Component also starts as unstructured and gains coherence gradually along the individual’s evolutionary journey through experiences and social awareness.

6-The domain of the Old Open-loop cycle of instincts is initially in blank space and gradually populated with cyclical instinctual patterns based on environmental interactions and internal conflicts encountered throughout life.

 

Observation 5:

Hypocrisy becomes contagious when individuals enter survival mode or seek competitive advantages. It manifests as a strategic behavior in such states, shaping how accountability is perceived and approached in social contexts.

The Influence of Old Open-Loop Instinct on Logical Data Processing

The harmonic algorithmic codes that exist beyond the boundaries of the Conscious and Subconscious Frameworks have the potential to elevate awareness and mindfulness. This elevation supports the capacity to regulate and stabilize chaotic or destabilizing conditions throughout the evolutionary trajectory of human life. Observational studies suggest that establishing harmonic balance within social contexts contributes significantly to cultivating peaceful and cooperative Conscious and Subconscious Components, facilitating optimal decision-making processes.

However, in practical and contemporary settings, social environments are frequently characterized by aggression, insecure attachment, and disrupted harmony. Consequently, influential decision-makers must attain a heightened optimization level in navigating their belief systems and behavioral choices to respond effectively to the complexities of human development and sustainability challenges. The algorithmic codes that extend beyond the domain of basic survival instincts in decision-makers are often rooted in Old Open-Loop Cycles, a behavioral state associated with starvation mode. In antagonistic and competitive environments, decision-making patterns may regress into relying on primal and offensive instincts to ensure survival. This regression can lead to drastic, competitive responses that intensify conflict within the global economic landscape and the human life process.

 

The Old Open-Loop Cycle functions in three sequential stages, occurring at specific intervals:

 

1-Stage One: The functional mechanisms of starvation protocols are triggered within the Open-Loop Cycle, signaling the Survival Instinct to activate and release primitive starvation responses.

 

2-Stage Two: The activated Survival Instinct initiates forceful instinctual behavior to convert the starvation condition into a Closed-Loop state for specific survival goals. However, complex environmental parameters may hinder these energetic instincts, necessitating re-engaging the Survival Instinct and logical data within the Conscious Component.

 

3-Stage Three: The Survival Instinct, through its Open-Loop processing cycle, relays signals back to the domain of the Old Open-Loop Cycle, where broader and long-term instinctual solutions are evaluated and generated. This process can indicate complexity in distinct instincts.

Critically, the decision-making dynamics influenced by the Old Open-Loop cycles of instincts tend to prioritize instinctual feedback from the Subconscious Component rather than optimal logical data processed by the Conscious Repository. This misalignment means that decision-makers increasingly rely on aggressive instinctual codes designed to trigger Closed-Loop survival responses, thus excluding rational codes from consciousness.

Primary Conclusion

 

Wild algorithmic codes embedded within the broader universe, coupled with aggressive instinctual patterns rooted in the Subconscious Component and destabilizing environmental conditions, frequently obstruct the integration and execution of optimal logical data from the Conscious Component. As a result, highly charged energetic codes dominate the Decision-Making Map within the Subconscious Component. Survival-based algorithmic codes struggle to align with rational processes in environments marked by hardship and hostility. Consequently, optimal decision-making remains elusive, and human behavior becomes trapped in a recurring, self-reinforcing vicious cycle. (Fig 1, 2)

 

  

                                                                          

 

 

 

Observation 1:

The wild universal order, governed by intelligible principal vibrations, initiates and stimulates systematic survival responses within Biological Systems. These survival signals activate the Survival Instinct, which triggers and processes the Open-Loop Cycle of Instincts within the Subconscious Component. During this cycle, the Survival Instinct engages aggressive instinctual patterns to support the transition toward Closed-Loop conditions, ensuring immediate survival responses. However, activating such aggressive instincts can significantly disrupt or obstruct logical data flow from the Conscious Component into the Decision-Making Map, thus impairing rational and reflective decision-making processes.

 

Observation 2:

The severe and often cruel nature of algorithmic codes originating beyond the Wild Universe reveals how the darker aspects of human behavior can spike, amplify, and sustain the influence of the Old Open-Loop Cycle of Instincts, placing continuous pressure on the Survival Instinct. The persistence of these Open-Loop cycles contributes to the fortification of the Ego Framework, allowing the Decision-Making Map to capture and integrate potent energetic codes necessary to pursue life objectives. In this configuration, the dynamic Ego structure becomes instrumental in maintaining directional momentum toward existential goals despite the dominance of survival-driven instinctual inputs.

 

Observation 3:

Optimal logical data within the Conscious Component signifies the presence of algorithmic codes embedded in the decision-making map that operate effectively within environmental contexts, generating harmonious outcomes without causing adverse effects on the evolutionary path of life.