Social
hypocrisy can obstruct the functional dynamics of distinct instincts, leaving
them in a state of deprivation or starvation. This starvation reinforces the
persistence of Old Open-loop cycles within the Subconscious Component. As a
result, the Instinct Component begins processing and signaling unrelated or
suppressed instincts, leading to the execution of decision-making codes that
are misaligned and incompatible with genuine social needs. Consequently, the
domain governed by Old Open-loop cycles repeatedly calls upon the Survival
Instinct to intervene and rescue various instincts from a deadlock state.
However, the Open-loop cycle can remain self-perpetuating due to feedback from
actions in the physical world, so it would be challenging to establish a
sustainable Closed-loop configuration within distinct active instincts.
In this
context, the foundational codes of the Superego Framework challenge and invoke
the Survival Instinct to activate dormant or misaligned aggressive instincts.
The aim is to realign them with the Network of Cooperative Instincts, which are
instincts responsive to environmental demands and conducive to improving
unhealthy or imbalanced lifestyles.
Hypocrisy is an inherent aspect of
social life.
Algorithmic
codes beyond Instinct Hypocrisy serve as psychological defense mechanisms to
protect individuals and societies. However, in doing so, these codes can
activate instincts, belief systems, and other modules within the Subconscious
Component in ways that contradict the current default values of functional
operation. The algorithmic codes generated from logical data within the
Conscious Component may inadvertently support the temporary and self-serving
strategies of Instinct Hypocrisy, particularly under survival pressure. This
phenomenon can be linked to cognitive dissonance and psychological biases that
influence decision-making patterns and social behavior. Importantly, this
process is not inherently malicious. Instead, it reflects the natural outcome
of navigating complex emotions within chaotic or competitive social
environments.
Cognitive
Dissonance emerges when the Survival Instinct triggers unnatural or non-default
instincts that are not initially programmed for the current context and that
align with the individual’s belief system. This misalignment produces internal
discomfort. To resolve this discomfort, individuals may rationalize their
behavior, deny contradictions, or modify the algorithmic codes that structure
their belief system and associated submodules to align with their actions.
These unnatural instincts disrupt the rational flow of information
and promote aggressive, short-term survival strategies. Consequently, they
hinder the seamless integration of refined algorithmic logic into the
Decision-Making Map, undermining long-term harmony and impeding evolutionary
development.
As a result,
hypocrisy reinforces the persistence of Old Open-loop instinctual cycles,
leading to instinctual malnutrition and the proliferation of elusive or
fragmented decision-making codes. Over time, this internal dissonance manifests
in social behaviors, aggravating disorders, and amplifying the absurdity of
interactions within social contexts.
On a global scale
Hypocrisy is
often engineered and institutionalized by influential decision-makers and elite
groups as a strategic tool to maintain control, secure competitive advantages,
and sustain a perceived balance within global economic systems. However, the
deeper algorithmic codes underlying Global Hypocrisy can destabilize long-term
human development, ultimately undermining efforts toward sustainable and
harmonious evolution on a planetary scale.
Universal Hypocrisy at the Core of the Emergence
of the World
The prolonged execution of algorithmic codes
underlying Social Hypocrisy can evolve into a more pervasive phenomenon. For
example, Chronic Hypocrisy is a condition that gradually reshapes the
behavioral dynamics of communities and alters the foundational structure of the
entire Instinct Component, including critical submodules within both the
Subconscious and Conscious Components.
Systems Owners often cultivate and deploy
Social Hypocrisy to secure competitive advantages by manipulating Global
Variables. In doing so, social contexts become vessels for hypocritical codes, embedded
with the strategic principles of ruling classes and enforced by influential
decision-makers. These elements shape daily decision-making patterns within
populations, aligning them with the distorted logic of hostile global dynamics
and survival-driven motivations.
As a result, the Decision-Making Map becomes
populated with codes contradicting the Subconscious Component’s intrinsic
nature and the autonomy of free belief systems. This dissonance erodes ethical
behavior, weakens societal trust, and degrades the credibility of shared values
within system environments.
Ultimately, the cumulative effect of chronic
social hypocrisy and systemic deception initiates a reconfiguration of the
Global Variables embedded within system platforms. Thus, it can trigger
multi-phase transitions across societies, solidifying a paradigm of Universal Hypocrisy at the
core of the emergence of the world system.
Observation 1:
Offensive instincts can be triggered and executed within the Decision-Making
Map under harsh environmental conditions, instinctual deadlocks, and
unpredictable disturbances in human life. The Decision-Making Map may default
to antagonistic codes in such states, even when robust logical data is
available within the Conscious Component. As a result, most individuals
instinctively detect internal signals of distress and initiate rescue
mechanisms. This process often leads to the automatic activation of aggressive
instinctual codes, embedded within the decision-making framework, as a means of
survival and adaptation.
Observation 2:
Humans are equipped with inherent algorithmic codes that extend beyond
primitive instinctual mechanisms. These deeper codes operate within a spectrum
of favorable and unfavorable patterns, influencing the functional mechanisms of
instincts that, in turn, embed specific instructions into the Decision-Making
Map.
The algorithmic architecture
underlying the Belief System plays a pivotal role in modulating the internal
dialogue between the Ego and Superego frameworks. This modulation allows for selecting
and allocating optimal codes into the Subconscious Component, guiding
individuals through complex decisions and ethical considerations.
Simultaneously, the self-regulating
mechanisms of the Conscious Component continuously adjust decision-making
patterns through the integration of logical codes. Over time, this dynamic
interaction results in the unfolding of decision pathways that reflect an
accumulating cycle of instinctual signals. These cycles collectively
instantiate the Belief System, the latent structures of the Iceberg Cells, and
the logical architecture of Consciousness itself.
Observation 3:
In understanding the perpetuation and encapsulation of algorithmic codes within
the decision-making process, humans must develop conscious awareness of the
internal mechanisms shaping their choices. Several critical questions emerge to
illuminate this dynamic:
1-How many Active/Inactive Instincts
contribute shared algorithmic codes executed by the Subconscious Component in
decision-making?
2-What is the duration of starvation
within the Old Open-loop cycle of instincts before resolution or transformation
occurs?
3-What kind of algorithmic outcomes
are generated or vibrated within the structures of the Iceberg Cells?
4-What algorithmic architectures may
exist beyond the Belief System within the deeper layers of the Subconscious
Component?
5-Which optimal principles are
embedded within the logical data housed in the Conscious Component?
6-Which specific instincts are
activated or suppressed within the Instinct Component during decision
processing?
These reflective inquiries are
gateways for decoding the internal logic behind behavioral patterns,
psychological resistance, and human adaptation in evolving environments.
Observation 4:
Each submodule within the Subconscious Component possesses the capacity to
modulate algorithmic codes that function independently of the conceptual
Decision-Making Map. These deeper characteristics shape individual behavior and
response patterns over time. The development blueprint of hidden algorithmic
structures across life stages can be described as follows:
1-Humans are born with inherent
algorithmic codes that extend beyond instinctual drives, residing in the deeper
layers of the Subconscious Component.
2-The Belief System originates as a
blank slate, devoid of codes at birth, and progressively accumulates data through
lived experience.
3-The Ego Framework is characterized
by a relatively stable set of algorithmic codes present from birth, shaping
identity and self-regulation.
4-The Superego Framework begins
without embedded codes and gradually internalizes moral, ethical, and societal
algorithms through the Superego Adjuster within social contexts.
5-The logical data within the
Conscious Component also starts as unstructured and gains coherence gradually
along the individual’s evolutionary journey through experiences and social awareness.
6-The domain of the Old Open-loop cycle
of instincts is initially in blank space and gradually populated with cyclical
instinctual patterns based on environmental interactions and internal conflicts
encountered throughout life.
Observation 5:
Hypocrisy
becomes contagious when individuals enter survival mode or seek competitive
advantages. It manifests as a strategic behavior pattern in such states,
shaping how accountability is perceived and approached across various social
contexts.
