Hypocrisy in Non-Biological Systems arises from
the conflict between global variables and the inherent operations of system
platforms. This contradiction emerges because System Owners prioritize economic
development, leading to inconsistencies. An optimal economy becomes crucial in
chaotic environments, driving owners to apply economic perspectives for gain.
However, this introduces risk, as the system framework must account for the
essential role of system resources.
Hypocrisy is further generated when ethical local
variables are implemented within specific system layers, while unethical global
variables dominate the broader framework and vice versa.
Observation:
A cognitive model of hypocrisy in Non-Biological Systems
suggests and challenges social contexts to activate a "Hypocrisy Instinct"
within system resources. However, in contrast, Biological Systems not only accept but also
integrate hypocrisy as a social norm for sustainability and competitive
advantage within the platform.
Observation:
System Owners invest substantial capital to
safeguard encapsulated parameters within social hypocrisy. For instance,
capital is often directed toward democratic ideals, creating the illusion of
freedom. This hypocritical model can sometimes promote a temporary harmonic
balance among system resources, simultaneously shielding environments from
complexity in the short term.
Observation:
Most Biological Systems with contaminated
deception parameters are rarely held accountable, decreasing reliability. This
unreliability may extend to Non-Biological Systems, causing dependable assets
to diminish.
Observation:
The hypocrisy instinct can sometimes shield Biological
Systems from external forces. Through this instinct, Biological Systems can
adapt to unfamiliar environments.
No comments:
Post a Comment