Monday, August 10, 2015

Modern Hypocrisy as an input generates and propagates in hierarchical layers

Parameter of Modern Hypocrisy can propagate by hierarchical layers in Biological Systems and Non-biological Systems. Decision Makers in hierarchical layers would underestimate social complexity and vulnerability within the context of Hypocrisy,

There are two identical arrays of Hypocrisy process mode within Biological Systems and Non-biological Systems. These two arrays imply Hypocrisy either unintentional or intentional process modeling according to the descriptions that follow.

1- Hypocrisy and processing mode can activate and propagate unintentionally in Brain (Biological Systems) when two contradictory Instincts with different instance algorithms appeared to be on a collision course with each other.

Hypocrisy paradigm can activate unintentionally in Non-biological Systems when collision course appear between two contradictory Global Strategies, Goal and Political Failure, and discrepancies between Strategic Plan and Operational System. The source of Hypocrisy in this category is critical political economy, hidden overhead costs, and unpredicted phenomena changes in internal and external system platform.

2- Hypocrisy and processing mode is used as a tactic consciously and intentionally in order to pretend a false allegation. This type of Moral Hypocrisy does not discuss in this case study.

Hypocrisy and processing mode can activate and propagate unintentionally in Brain framework. Paradox of unintentional Hypocrisy can be activated and launched by predators during hunting. For example, a lioness adopted baby antelope like one of her own cubs after she killed the baby antelope’s mother. Because of strong Motherly Instinct, lioness took care of baby antelope. Two contradictory Instincts confronted over sending signal to logical part of Brain. Strong Instinct can always eliminate weak Instinct during instincts confrontation.

Collision course between two contradictory Instincts reduces Harmonic Balance in Brain. Lioness can face mental illness or perpetuate the cycle of deprivation if Motherly Instinct become extreme stronger than wild Instinct (killer Instinct). Although baby antelope thought at the first sight that lioness was her own mother. “Baby antelope went between lioness’ legs like it was trying to get its milk. Lioness was confused and stood in front of baby antelope 45 minutes”. At this juncture, two contradictory Instincts confront in lioness’ Brain. Gesture of baby antelope near lioness’ legs modifies and fortifies Motherly Instinct. Please take look at some photos through the following link.

Lioness’ motherly instincts kick in, adopts baby antelope

The lifestyle can cause hypocrisy for family structure and individuals in Social Context. For example, individuals who used to eat meat during their entire life suddenly came to believe that eating animal products goes far beyond personal choice. This phenomenon identify as lifestyle of Hypocrisy. People can face the cycle of deprivation in extreme cases when Instinctive eating principal and Social Instinct are set on a collision course. Internal Hypocrisy is to be propagated unintentionally in Brain, inactivate empathic Instinct, and many instances functional Instincts modify Decision Making Patterns. Internal Hypocrisy causes Open-loops, complexity, and severe depression in Biological Systems. Moreover, Hypocrisy is the natural state of the human mind.

Modern Hypocrisy as an input generates and propagates through hierarchical layers. Big Corporations (BC) articulate Strategic Planning Parameters in Competitive World (CW) in terms of competitiveness. Strategic parameters from (BC) modify Strategic parameters in (CW). New Strategic Parameters in Big Corporations may not be so friendly with environmental parameters and control strategies in Subsystem.

Big Corporations would not invest time to measure side-effects of Strategic Parameters and possible Hypocrisy in Competitive World. It is not cost-effective and realistic to measure potential outcome framework of Hypocrisy because Big Corporation cannot predict consequences of future self-generated thoughts and integrated strategies in Competitive World. (Fig 1)

BC + CW = the first cycle of Hypocrisy in Competitive World (invisible)

New Strategic Planning Parameters in Competitive World demands Modifications in Global Variables (GV). System Owner modifies Strategic Parameters in Global Variables in order to align new Strategic Planning Parameters from Competitive World. 

CW + GV = the second cycle of Hypocrisy in Global Variables (invisible)

System Owner obliges to align and optimize unintentionally the second cycle of Hypocrisy in Global Variables within Social Context. Instance of the second cycle of Hypocrisy modify parameters in Social Context.

GV + SC = the third cycle of Hypocrisy in Social Context (invisible)

Instance of the third cycle of Hypocrisy in Social Context modify both Biological Systems and Non-Biological Systems.

Biological Systems try to adopt the third cycle of Hypocrisy from Social Context. New Hypocrisy may require activating of certain Instincts and inactivating other Instincts. This procedure can cause collision course between two Contradictory Instincts (CI) in Brain. Eventually, the fourth cycle of Hypocrisy in Biological Systems rolling back parameter modification from Brain framework to Social Context. Multiple Hypocrisy in Social Context perpetuate on the evolutionary path of life. (Fig 1)

SC + CI = the fourth cycle of Hypocrisy in Brain (invisible)

CI + SC = the fifth cycle of Hypocrisy in Social Context (invisible)

Structural codes articulate according to object-oriented design patterns in Non-biological Systems. Object-oriented design patterns can formalize goals, functions, and tackle real world situations in order to solve common problems and discuss complicated technical issues for construction framework.

Hypocrisy in Social Context modifies object oriented design patterns and instance of source codes. Complicated source codes modify system operations and it causes complexity both in Biological Systems and Non-biological Systems. 

“Hypocrisy” in Biological Systems and “Bugs in source code” in Non-biological Systems have a fairly good analogy. Because, “Hypocrisy” instantiate in Biological Systems as result of “suboptimal codes and algorithms” (contradictory algorithms among instincts). “Bugs in source code” occurs in a program by mistakes of system programmers due to either program’s source code “suboptimal codes and algorithms” or “principles of algorithm design”.   
A good operational system requires optimal strategic plan for system maintenance. Optimal maintenance policies handle internal, external complexity and enhance performance.  Good maintainability and accuracy for sustainable framework require appropriate economic impact.  An optimal operation of powerful system has high costs of maintenance. Systems Owners have tendency to rationalize operational costs focusing on maintenance. Reducing operations and maintenance costs can cause Hypocrisy in system performances because parameters in operational system would be on a collision course with Global Strategic Planning for regular system maintenance. Internal and external customers might capture parameters of hypocrisy.
Paradox between Global Strategic Planning and operational system illustrates something far beyond of Hypocrisy. Global Strategic Planning modifies source codes and programming pattern.

No comments: