Outrageous Hypocrisy in Source Codes

Hypocrisy is the natural state of the Human Mind. Naturally, Systems Owners would explore instance parameters of Hypocrisy either intentionally or unintentionally. Parameters of Hypocrisy instantiate in the System Platform by deceptive planning codes that can establish unpredictable operations from a systems perspective. 

System Owners can build policy strategies for Process Management Activities and Technological Design processes. Hypocrisy Parameters might be involved in the project development process. 

Management Teams can cooperate with Technological Design Members within enterprises to identify customer needs and algorithms behind source codes. Technological Design Members can build IT-technology solutions and may maintain a watch list of encapsulated forms of technologies.

Potential Hypocrisy as an Input in a systems program can be generated through the Construction phase. The wrong system mental model and cost-effective assessment of the technological design can cause obstacles. Besides, a lack of systems thinking would modify functionalities in Source Codes within the Management Team.

Example 1: An operational system would produce Outputs cost-effectively without understanding feedback-seeking behavior (learning and performance goal orientation). 

Logical Consequences must measure and identify source code needs before formulating and declaring algorithms on the state of UML objects.

Example 2: Operational Systems show contradictions between a Strategic Planning System (Specific Inputs) and an instance of Output Patterns.

Potential Hypocrisy can be generated through the Maintenance Phase while specific processes are eliminated and modified because of the most cost-effectiveness for External Forces.

In case study 1, the system platform must synchronize components and modules according to accumulated data in case studies every two weeks. System components operate like the default mode and realistic natural behavior in the System Framework.  

The Maintenance Phase’s strategic alignment model can be based on cost-reducing time series analysis in the project process. Accumulated data in time series analysis is encapsulated in the system platform every three weeks (change time interval from 2 to 3 weeks).

Sometimes, Systems Owners are compelled to change Operations through cost-reduction measures in streamlining manufacturing. Project Leaders can compromise with External Forces to sustain gains on their own: 

1- Reduce time series analysis on case studies to save costs. It can decrease the quality of services.

2- Labor expenses and overhead costs. It might cause complexity in Social Contexts.

3- Add and eliminate functions into products. It can modify optimal operations.

4- Reduce product lifetime because of Competitive Advantages. It generates customer dissatisfaction. 

The discrepancy between the Default Maintenance Mode and Modified Maintenance Condition can generate Outrageous Hypocrisy in source codes within the System Platform. Complexity among source codes would cause partial Open-loop Cycles in system performances. It requires a Sub-optimization Mode for resolving integrative complexity for short-term time series. (Fig 1)

  

Case study 2, Manufacture Products, targets moving quickly to market and curtailing the product development process because the time to market determines competitive advantage (TTM). The concept beyond TTM is profitability, return on investment (ROI) in short-term missions, and speed innovation.

Instance parameters of TTM can encourage customers to help themselves by testing products and taking care of the technology. 

Customers can return a product to the store three times for reparation and optimization. A customer might get rewards with VIP status (a brand-new product or extra services) if Product Functions or Service availability respond hardly to customer satisfaction the third time. Error information in a product failure can send the product to a designated department for tracking errors and improving assessment procedures. 

The enterprise focuses on developing and providing a unique perspective for the customer engagement model for rationalizing Operational Costs. This customer engagement model would hardly be convenient and feasible because customers need volunteers to allocate spare time for developing products and services. Sometimes, poor-quality products can devastate customers’ wallets and Customer Value Propositions. (Fig 2)

                                                                                

 

 

Observation:

Hypocrisy within TTM is a Phenomenon that occurs in the system platform when the System Owner is aware of Customer Dissatisfaction and lets the Paradox involve Operational Outputs. One of the Global strategies for most enterprises is Customer Satisfaction; however, a result of Operational Outputs might sometimes show Customer Dissatisfaction. 

 

Observation:

Sub-optimization implies short-term gains instead of long-term success. Sub-optimization must be explored when Systems Owners articulate Outrageous Hypocrisy in Sub-optimization as an alternative option for resolving issues in source codes. It allows the System Mechanism to roll- back to normal mode in short-term performance goals. There are two possible case scenarios out of the several possibilities in Sub-optimization. These two possible case scenarios can be defined as follows.

The best-case scenario = short-term gains + long-term ambiguity (Depend on rational perceptions)

 

The worst-case scenario can be divided into three consecutive processes as follows.

1- Short term losses + high costs and few benefits = complexities of multiple identities (Open-loop Cycle).

2- Open-Loop Cycle + approach for a new interval of Sub-optimization = outcome would be complexities (Old Open-loop Cycles).

3- Open-loops + execute the multidisciplinary design of Sub-optimization = complexities of multiple identities (Old Open-loop Cycles).

Observation:

Lifetime constraints of products can contribute to system maintenance. It can increase economic efficiency. This method is the economic Hypocrisy of source codes, generating more profits at the expense of loyal customers.

 

Observation:

Hypocrisy Instinct (Hypocritical instinct) is an efficient natural defense mechanism against External Forces. It activates in the Subconscious Component for personal gains, competitive advantage, and productivity. Systems Owners of Multinational Enterprises can possess an active Hypocrisy Instinct because it generates sustainable competitiveness, national security, and Harmonic Balance in the Global Economy. 

Deceitful Algorithms beyond Global Variables can cause complexity in Social Contexts and generate side effects in Biological and Non-Biological Systems.

Observation:

Exploring Outrageous Hypocrisy in the construction phase can build disaster. For example, implications within aerospace technology systems may cause tragic circumstances that impact Humans.